Website review, no card needed

listentech.com logo

listentech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202633 issues · 87 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on listentech.com, 10 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.7 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.4 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.7 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20265.2 s
Sep 5, 20265.3 s
Sep 12, 20265.0 s
Sep 19, 20264.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
430 ms90 msMay 2Oct 17272 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026152 ms
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026129 ms
May 23, 2026138 ms
May 30, 2026204 ms
Jun 6, 2026290 ms
Jun 13, 2026328 ms
Jun 20, 2026344 ms
Jun 27, 2026362 ms
Jul 4, 2026363 ms
Jul 11, 2026363 ms
Jul 18, 2026357 ms
Jul 25, 2026364 ms
Aug 1, 2026371 ms
Aug 8, 2026386 ms
Aug 15, 2026391 ms
Aug 22, 2026379 ms
Aug 29, 2026373 ms
Sep 5, 2026323 ms
Sep 12, 2026307 ms
Sep 19, 2026317 ms
Sep 26, 2026282 ms
Oct 3, 2026264 ms
Oct 10, 2026269 ms
Oct 17, 2026272 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of listentech.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. listentech.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. listentech.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. listentech.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. listentech.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. listentech.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. listentech.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. listentech.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. listentech.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix56
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 391 KiB

    About 391 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    50 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 236 ms

    236 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,574 HTML elements

    The page has 1,574 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Cookiebot and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 857 KiB and 390 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 36 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (36 KiB).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Improve image delivery

    10 KiB

    1 image could be 10 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 675 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Your largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Assistive Listening and Communication Solutions Because eve…”.

  • Speed Index: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 353 ms

    353 ms

    Real visitors wait 353 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 88% slower for real visitors

    +88%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 272 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 990 ms

    990 ms

    Real visitors wait 990 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 30 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.51 g of CO₂e: 61.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 90 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 90 requests on a phone: scripts 849 KiB (21), other files 350 KiB (3) and fonts 246 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9093
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (49 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 49 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 28 links without text

    28 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h4 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8572
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Home - Listen Technologies”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 2 problems, for example “WebPage: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • 13 links with vague text

    13 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 188 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 188 pages on listentech.com and 14 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.listentech.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.listentech.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,427 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (10 KiB, 56 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /product-category/auri-broadcast-audio, /product-category/loop, /product-category/infrared, /product-category/radio-frequency, /product-category/digital and /product-category/listen-wifi and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 803 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 803 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get In Touch”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Get In Touch”, “Learn More” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at listentech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on listentech.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25