Website review, no card needed

lkq.cz logo

lkq.cz website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202645 issues · 83 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on lkq.cz, 24 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s973 msMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
159 ms120 msMay 9Oct 24154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026125 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026127 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026126 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026135 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026141 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms
Oct 24, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lkq.cz (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lkq.cz at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. lkq.cz at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. lkq.cz at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. lkq.cz at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. lkq.cz at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. lkq.cz at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. lkq.cz at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. lkq.cz at 5.8 s5.8 s

Speed

9 to fix33
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    16.1 s · 2.2 MB

    About 2.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    13.7 s

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 13.7 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3.3 s · 329 KiB

    329 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 154 KiB

    About 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 597 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (597 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 186 ms

    186 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 186 ms of main-thread work and 361 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Optanon), adding 470 KiB and 223 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 19 KiB

    1 image could be 19 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 231 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.43

    0.43

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.43 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.9 s

    29.9 s

    Your largest element takes 29.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 61% slower for real visitors

    +61%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.124

    0.124

    The layout shifts by 0.124 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Real visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 127 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (29), images 1.0 MB (48) and stylesheets 295 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (211 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (29 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.48 g of CO₂e: 177.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7683
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (109 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 109 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.lkq.cz/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 11 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 11 pages on lkq.cz and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “LKQ CZ s.r.o. - největší dodavatel autodílů, autodoplňků a autopotřeb na českém trhu. Široká síť autoservisů a téměř 10…”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Náhradní díly, autodíly - LKQ CZ E-Shop”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lkq.cz/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    49%

    The HTML your server sends has 176 of the 361 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.lkq.cz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    45 of 51 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 361 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 361 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lkq.cz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
The Czech Republic

Company

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Prague

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on lkq.cz, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25