Website review, no card needed

locinox.com logo

locinox.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202647 issues · 96 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on locinox.com, 17 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 171.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms104 msMay 2Oct 17136 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026119 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026115 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026110 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026110 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026125 ms
Sep 19, 2026124 ms
Sep 26, 2026127 ms
Oct 3, 2026129 ms
Oct 10, 2026132 ms
Oct 17, 2026136 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of locinox.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. locinox.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. locinox.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. locinox.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. locinox.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. locinox.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. locinox.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. locinox.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. locinox.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

14 to fix39
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    11.7 s · 2.0 MB

    About 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.0 s · 959 KiB

    43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (959 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 156 KiB

    About 156 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and ZenDesk and others), adding 3.3 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 334 KiB

    9 images could be 334 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 421 ms

    421 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 421 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 326 ms

    326 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 326 ms of main-thread work and 987 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 78 KiB

    78 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • ZenDesk adds 260 ms

    260 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 473 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 107 ms

    107 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 107 ms of main-thread work and 395 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 70 ms

    70 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 141 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.1 s

    28.1 s

    Your largest element takes 28.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.1 s

    29.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 603 ms

    603 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 603 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Real visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 636 ms

    636 ms

    Real visitors wait 636 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors

    -30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.059

    0.059

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.059, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 116 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 3.6 MB (40), images 560 KiB (27) and fonts 270 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    189 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 286fa55f-0c6b-4c07-8ec5-2e55dd79d533.png at 640 px wide, shown at 81 px. Resized copies would save about 189 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (282 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 160.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8189
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 29 text elements with low contrast

    29 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (4 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8577
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (251 characters)

    Your meta description is 251 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 134 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 134 pages on locinox.com and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Locinox - Gate & Fence Hardware”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.locinox.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.locinox.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (499 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 6 pages share a title

    https://www.locinox.com/en-gb, https://www.locinox.com/de-de, https://www.locinox.com/fr-fr, https://www.locinox.com/nl-be, https://www.locinox.com/pl-pl and https://www.locinox.com/ru-ru all use the title “Locinox - Gate & Fence Hardware”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/contact, https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/gate-closers, https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/gate-closers/new-fit, https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/gate-closers/retro-fit, https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/gate-closers/accessories and https://www.locinox.com/en-gb/gate-closers/accessories/adapters and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://www.locinox.com/de-de, https://www.locinox.com/fr-fr, https://www.locinox.com/nl-be, https://www.locinox.com/pl-pl and https://www.locinox.com/ru-ru use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.locinox.com/de-de, https://www.locinox.com/es-es, https://www.locinox.com/fr-fr, https://www.locinox.com/nl-be, https://www.locinox.com/pl-pl and https://www.locinox.com/ru-ru and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.locinox.com/ru-ru has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 95 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 5081
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 357 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 357 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Demo Cases” and “Contact us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and Umami.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at locinox.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Sana Commerce
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on locinox.com, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25