Website review, no card needed

lojack.com logo

lojack.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202632 issues · 87 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on lojack.com, 11 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s933 msMay 9Oct 241.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 2026970 ms
May 23, 2026956 ms
May 30, 2026966 ms
Jun 6, 2026998 ms
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.0 s
Sep 5, 2026974 ms
Sep 12, 2026983 ms
Sep 19, 2026996 ms
Sep 26, 2026997 ms
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
95 ms77 msMay 9Oct 2493 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202679 ms
May 16, 202680 ms
May 23, 202680 ms
May 30, 202680 ms
Jun 6, 202685 ms
Jun 13, 202683 ms
Jun 20, 202683 ms
Jun 27, 202684 ms
Jul 4, 202685 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202684 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202682 ms
Aug 8, 202683 ms
Aug 15, 202683 ms
Aug 22, 202681 ms
Aug 29, 202683 ms
Sep 5, 202685 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202688 ms
Oct 17, 202688 ms
Oct 24, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lojack.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lojack.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lojack.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lojack.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lojack.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lojack.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lojack.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lojack.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lojack.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix52
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.7 s · 651 KiB

    About 651 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.7 s · 402 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (402 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Optanon and Google Maps and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 167 KiB

    7 images could be 167 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 528 ms

    528 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 528 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 254 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Maps adds 214 ms

    214 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 214 ms of main-thread work and 395 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    270 ms · 79 KiB

    About 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 270 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 86 but mobile only 52. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Your largest element takes 15.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Award-Winning, Law Enforcement-Integrated Vehicle Protectio…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.3 s

    16.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 85 ms

    85 ms

    Real visitors wait 85 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 514 ms

    514 ms

    Real visitors wait 514 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 183 ms

    183 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 183 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.064

    0.064

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.064, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 62 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 62 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (27), images 585 KiB (15) and other files 393 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (219 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8888
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (3 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “LoJack : GPS Device”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (212 characters)

    Your meta description is 212 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 35 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 35 pages on lojack.com and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Award-Winning, Law Enforcement-Integrated Vehicle Protection.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lojack.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lojack.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.lojack.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (523 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.lojack.com/owner-registration, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.lojack.com/blog/2026/09/lojack-wins-2026-dealers-choice-award-for-vehicle-tracking-voted-by-dealers-who-use-it-every-day, https://www.lojack.com/blog/2026/09/theft-on-the-lot, https://www.lojack.com/blog/2026/08/the-force-multiplier, https://www.lojack.com/customer-support/lojack-automotive-spireon-products-warranty and https://www.lojack.com/owner-hub-interstitial have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cookies is not defined https://www.lojack.com/wp-content/plugins/handl-utm-grabber-v3/js/cross-device-traffic.js?ver=17…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 538 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 538 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Learn More” and “Register a LoJack System”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lojack.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1986
Headquarters
Canton

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on lojack.com, including 15 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
lojack.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable