Website review, no card needed

lojasmel.com logo

lojasmel.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202662 issues · 101 checks

This review found 62 issues worth fixing on lojasmel.com, 22 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.4 s3.5 sMay 9Oct 243.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.2 s
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.1 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.1 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20264.5 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
390 ms236 msMay 9Oct 24372 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026267 ms
May 16, 2026259 ms
May 23, 2026260 ms
May 30, 2026254 ms
Jun 6, 2026258 ms
Jun 13, 2026267 ms
Jun 20, 2026282 ms
Jun 27, 2026306 ms
Jul 4, 2026323 ms
Jul 11, 2026344 ms
Jul 18, 2026347 ms
Jul 25, 2026346 ms
Aug 1, 2026345 ms
Aug 8, 2026341 ms
Aug 15, 2026349 ms
Aug 22, 2026345 ms
Aug 29, 2026345 ms
Sep 5, 2026344 ms
Sep 12, 2026343 ms
Sep 19, 2026353 ms
Sep 26, 2026357 ms
Oct 3, 2026364 ms
Oct 10, 2026370 ms
Oct 17, 2026367 ms
Oct 24, 2026372 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lojasmel.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lojasmel.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. lojasmel.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. lojasmel.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  4. lojasmel.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  5. lojasmel.com at 7.5 s7.5 s
  6. lojasmel.com at 9.0 s9.0 s
  7. lojasmel.com at 10.4 s10.4 s
  8. lojasmel.com at 11.9 s11.9 s

Speed

17 to fix37
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    1.7 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.7 s on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    1.6 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 1.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • vtexassets.com adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 7.6 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 1.7 MB

    11 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 841 ms

    841 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 841 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 460 KiB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (460 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 79 KiB

    About 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 509 ms

    509 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 509 ms of main-thread work and 639 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 328 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • cloudfront.net adds 101 ms

    101 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,202 HTML elements

    The page has 2,202 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Server response: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Your server takes 1.8 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 20.3 s

    20.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 20.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “honeyhome - tabloide”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 870 ms

    870 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 870 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 487 ms

    487 ms

    Real visitors wait 487 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 267 ms to 372 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

2 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.032

    0.032

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.032, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.5 MB in 205 requests

    6.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 205 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (70), images 2.3 MB (57) and other files 742 KiB (61). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    50 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example afd25c75-ece8-4453-b686-61e24d51c556___e486f9f990729a69c1388 at 2,172 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 50 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (229 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 221.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8085
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 20 tap targets too small

    20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 101 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10071
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “lojasmel - Tudo, com amor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (186 characters)

    Your meta description is 186 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 59 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 59 pages on lojasmel.com and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lojasmel.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lojasmel.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.lojasmel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (880 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 7 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.lojasmel.com/464, https://www.lojasmel.com/216, https://www.lojasmel.com/172, https://www.lojasmel.com/941, https://www.lojasmel.com/796 and https://www.lojasmel.com/Viagens and 1 other are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 10 pages share a meta description

    https://www.lojasmel.com/cartao-lojasmel, https://www.lojasmel.com/todo-o-site, https://www.lojasmel.com/464, https://www.lojasmel.com/marcas-exclusivas-lojasmel, https://www.lojasmel.com/216 and https://www.lojasmel.com/172 and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.lojasmel.com/cartao-lojasmel has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.lojasmel.com/796, https://www.lojasmel.com/lavanderia-e-area-de-servico and https://www.lojasmel.com/eletroportateis took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 7 broken images

    7 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.lojasmel.com/.

  • 23 small tap targets

    23 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix44
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 504 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 504 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lojasmel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Enflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 62 issues on lojasmel.com, including 30 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
lojasmel.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable