Website review, no card needed
lojasmel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202662 issues · 101 checks
This review found 62 issues worth fixing on lojasmel.com, 22 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
54FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 267 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 259 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 260 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 357 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 367 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 372 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.5 s
6.0 s
7.5 s
9.0 s
10.4 s
11.9 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce initial server response time
1.7 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.7 s on a phone.
Document request latency
1.6 sThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
vtexassets.com adds 1.3 s
1.3 svtexassets.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.1 s
A phone's processor spends 8.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 7.6 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 1.7 MB11 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 841 ms
841 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 841 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 460 KiB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (460 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 79 KiBAbout 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 509 ms
509 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 509 ms of main-thread work and 639 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 328 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
cloudfront.net adds 101 ms
101 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,202 HTML elements
The page has 2,202 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 1.8 s
1.8 sYour server takes 1.8 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 20.3 s
20.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 30.9 s
30.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “honeyhome - tabloide”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sThe first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 870 ms
870 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 870 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 487 ms
487 msReal visitors wait 487 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.16
0.16For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors
+40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 267 ms to 372 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
21 images without width and height
21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors
-26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.032
0.032The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.032, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 205 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 205 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (70), images 2.3 MB (57) and other files 742 KiB (61). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
50 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example afd25c75-ece8-4453-b686-61e24d51c556___e486f9f990729a69c1388 at 2,172 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 50 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (229 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 221.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
20 tap targets too small
20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
19 text elements with low contrast
19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 101 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “lojasmel - Tudo, com amor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (186 characters)
Your meta description is 186 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
59 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 59 pages on lojasmel.com and 6 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.lojasmel.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lojasmel.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.lojasmel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (880 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.lojasmel.com/464, https://www.lojasmel.com/216, https://www.lojasmel.com/172, https://www.lojasmel.com/941, https://www.lojasmel.com/796 and https://www.lojasmel.com/Viagens and 1 other are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
10 pages share a meta description
https://www.lojasmel.com/cartao-lojasmel, https://www.lojasmel.com/todo-o-site, https://www.lojasmel.com/464, https://www.lojasmel.com/marcas-exclusivas-lojasmel, https://www.lojasmel.com/216 and https://www.lojasmel.com/172 and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://www.lojasmel.com/cartao-lojasmel has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.lojasmel.com/796, https://www.lojasmel.com/lavanderia-e-area-de-servico and https://www.lojasmel.com/eletroportateis took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 broken images
7 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.lojasmel.com/.
23 small tap targets
23 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 504 words of copy
The homepage carries about 504 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lojasmel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Enflow
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 62 issues on lojasmel.com, including 30 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.