Website review, no card needed
lolalytics.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202632 issues · 82 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on lolalytics.com, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 11.9 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 825 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 829 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 811 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 807 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 804 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 796 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 799 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 801 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 809 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 826 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 843 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 851 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 857 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 847 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 855 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 856 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 861 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 859 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 858 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 856 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 856 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 866 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 872 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 880 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 879 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 83 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 82 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 80 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 87 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 11.9 s
A phone's processor spends 11.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (nitropay.com, confiant-integrations.net and scalibur.io and others), adding 2.7 MB and 3.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1,001 KiB134 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1,001 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 858 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
nitropay.com adds 765 ms
765 msnitropay.com costs a phone 765 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
confiant-integrations.net adds 680 ms
680 msconfiant-integrations.net costs a phone 680 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
scalibur.io adds 568 ms
568 msscalibur.io costs a phone 568 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Rubicon Project adds 509 ms
509 msRubicon Project costs a phone 509 ms of main-thread work and 121 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 430 ms
430 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 430 ms of main-thread work and 636 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 16 KiB2 images could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
37 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 43.4 s
43.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s
3.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sYour largest element takes 2.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 82 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 121 ms
121 msReal visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 328 ms
328 msReal visitors wait 328 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 1,231 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 1,231 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (225), other files 570 KiB (540) and images 568 KiB (349). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 161.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 61 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
216 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 216 pages on lolalytics.com and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 108 characters
Your meta description is 108 characters: “LoLalytics analyses the current League of Legends meta for the best Build, Runes & Counters for Patch 16.20.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “League of Legends + ANALYTICS”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “League of Legends Analytics • LoLalytics • Patch 16.20”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://lolalytics.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lolalytics.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://lolalytics.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (796 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 179 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 broken images
6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://ids4.ad.gt/api/v1/ip_match?id=AU1D-0100-001791763468-M3KGD88T-V3M4.
36 third-party cookies
36 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
24 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 704 words of copy
The homepage carries about 704 words of visible text.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and The Trade Desk and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
52 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lolalytics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on lolalytics.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.