Website review, no card needed

lolalytics.com logo

lolalytics.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202632 issues · 82 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on lolalytics.com, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 11.9 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
893 ms783 msApr 18Oct 3879 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026825 ms
Apr 25, 2026829 ms
May 2, 2026811 ms
May 9, 2026807 ms
May 16, 2026804 ms
May 23, 2026796 ms
May 30, 2026799 ms
Jun 6, 2026801 ms
Jun 13, 2026809 ms
Jun 20, 2026826 ms
Jun 27, 2026843 ms
Jul 4, 2026851 ms
Jul 11, 2026857 ms
Jul 18, 2026847 ms
Jul 25, 2026855 ms
Aug 1, 2026856 ms
Aug 8, 2026861 ms
Aug 15, 2026859 ms
Aug 22, 2026858 ms
Aug 29, 2026856 ms
Sep 5, 2026856 ms
Sep 12, 2026866 ms
Sep 19, 2026872 ms
Sep 26, 2026880 ms
Oct 3, 2026879 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
91 ms78 msApr 18Oct 387 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202682 ms
Apr 25, 202683 ms
May 2, 202682 ms
May 9, 202681 ms
May 16, 202681 ms
May 23, 202680 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202680 ms
Jun 13, 202679 ms
Jun 20, 202680 ms
Jun 27, 202681 ms
Jul 4, 202681 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202680 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202683 ms
Aug 15, 202686 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Aug 29, 202689 ms
Sep 5, 202689 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lolalytics.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lolalytics.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lolalytics.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lolalytics.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lolalytics.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lolalytics.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lolalytics.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lolalytics.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lolalytics.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix59
  • Main-thread work: 11.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (nitropay.com, confiant-integrations.net and scalibur.io and others), adding 2.7 MB and 3.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1,001 KiB

    134 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1,001 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 858 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • nitropay.com adds 765 ms

    765 ms

    nitropay.com costs a phone 765 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • confiant-integrations.net adds 680 ms

    680 ms

    confiant-integrations.net costs a phone 680 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • scalibur.io adds 568 ms

    568 ms

    scalibur.io costs a phone 568 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Rubicon Project adds 509 ms

    509 ms

    Rubicon Project costs a phone 509 ms of main-thread work and 121 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 430 ms

    430 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 430 ms of main-thread work and 636 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    2 images could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 43.4 s

    43.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Your largest element takes 2.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 82 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 328 ms

    328 ms

    Real visitors wait 328 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 1,231 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 1,231 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (225), other files 570 KiB (540) and images 568 KiB (349). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 161.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8595
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 61 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 216 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 216 pages on lolalytics.com and 2 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 108 characters

    Your meta description is 108 characters: “LoLalytics analyses the current League of Legends meta for the best Build, Runes & Counters for Patch 16.20.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “League of Legends + ANALYTICS”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “League of Legends Analytics • LoLalytics • Patch 16.20”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lolalytics.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lolalytics.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://lolalytics.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (796 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 179 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 3574
  • 6 broken images

    6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://ids4.ad.gt/api/v1/ip_match?id=AU1D-0100-001791763468-M3KGD88T-V3M4.

  • 36 third-party cookies

    36 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix20
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 704 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 704 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and The Trade Desk and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 52 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lolalytics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on lolalytics.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25