Website review, no card needed
lovefairings.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202645 issues · 95 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on lovefairings.com, 23 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #55,365 of 108,958 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #36,261 of 61,775 online storesbeats 36%
- #34,684 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 196 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.1 s
3.1 s
4.2 s
5.2 s
6.2 s
7.3 s
8.3 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
Shopify adds 1.3 s
1.3 sShopify costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
9,648 HTML elements
The page has 9,648 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 7.2 s
A phone's processor spends 7.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and shop.app and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
353 KiBAbout 353 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 242 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
99 KiB13 images could be 99 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
34 KiB34 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 15.5 s
15.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sYour largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 686 ms
686 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 686 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sThe first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.158
0.158The layout shifts by 0.158 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 197 ms
197 msReal visitors wait 197 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 590 ms
590 msReal visitors wait 590 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 365 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 365 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (133), other files 1.2 MB (154) and images 371 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
bg1.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (2 elements)
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 64 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 65 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 13 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “LoveFairings - Specialized motorcycle fairings sport bike fairings”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (312 characters)
Your meta description is 312 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1,272 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 1,272 pages on lovefairings.com and 18 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.lovefairings.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lovefairings.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,346 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.lovefairings.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.lovefairings.com/collections/vendors, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a title
https://www.lovefairings.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.lovefairings.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.lovefairings.com/products/repsol-orange-black-fairings-and-bodywork-for-2004-2005-cbr1000rr-lf4395 and https://www.lovefairings.com/products/repsol-orange-black-fairings-and-bodywork-for-2006-2007-cbr1000rr-lf7192 all use the title “Repsol - Orange Black Fairings and Bodywork – LoveFairings”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.lovefairings.com/pages/order-status and https://www.lovefairings.com/customer_authentication/redirect have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
https://www.lovefairings.com/pages/order-status, https://www.lovefairings.com/pages/faqs, https://www.lovefairings.com/pages/contact, https://www.lovefairings.com/products/rizla-white-black-fairings-and-bodywork-for-2008-2010-gsx-r750-lf6381, https://www.lovefairings.com/products/repsol-silver-fairings-and-bodywork-for-2005-2006-cbr600rr-lf4441 and https://www.lovefairings.com/products/repsol-orange-black-fairings-and-bodywork-for-2004-2005-cbr1000rr-lf4395 and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 189 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.lovefairings.com/.
46 small tap targets
46 of 116 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'querySelector')”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
About 521 words of copy
The homepage carries about 521 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
27 calls to action
The homepage has 27 calls to action, for example “Order Status”, “Pre-Order” and “Register”.
50 short forms
50 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lovefairings.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Ymq Product Options · Judge Me Reviews · Inbox · Analyzely · T Lab Ai Translate · Content Translation · Profy Announcement Bar · Pushowl · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on lovefairings.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.