Website review, no card needed

loylty.com logo

loylty.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 76 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on loylty.com, 10 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.8 sMay 16Oct 312.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms82 msMay 16Oct 3195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 202686 ms
Jun 13, 202689 ms
Jun 20, 202693 ms
Jun 27, 2026103 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026108 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026102 ms
Aug 15, 202692 ms
Aug 22, 202691 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202698 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202691 ms
Oct 10, 202690 ms
Oct 17, 202686 ms
Oct 24, 2026100 ms
Oct 31, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of loylty.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. loylty.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. loylty.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. loylty.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. loylty.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. loylty.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. loylty.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. loylty.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. loylty.com at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

5 to fix51
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    700 ms · 4.2 MB

    39 images could be 4.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 MB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.6 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    730 ms · 75 KiB

    About 75 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 730 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 179 KiB and 136 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 84 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 425 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Leading transformation in customer engagement with technolo…”. Most of its time is resource load duration (3.1 s).

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.307

    0.307

    The layout shifts by 0.307 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 79 images without width and height

    79 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 117 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (100), scripts 314 KiB (11) and fonts 305 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 34 images in older formats

    34 images (5.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 25 images below the first screen load straight away

    25 images further down the page (3.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    30 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example consumer-loyalty.png at 522 px wide, shown at 163 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.73 g of CO₂e: 207.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8275
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Leading transformation in customer engagement wit…”, “Deliver customer delight,” and “Our expertise forged in a landscape of experience”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://loylty.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at loylty.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 50 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 50 pages on loylty.com and 3 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “Boost retention with brand loyalty programs powered by our consumer engagement platform and end-to-end loyalty program …”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Customer Engagement Technology Solutions | Loylty Rewardz”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://loylty.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (738 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 10 pages share a title

    https://loylty.com/technology/lidsys-xlii, https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/who-we-are, https://loylty.com/about/clients and https://loylty.com/about/awards and 4 others all use the title “Loylty Rewardz”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 10 pages share a meta description

    https://loylty.com/technology/lidsys-xlii, https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/who-we-are, https://loylty.com/about/clients and https://loylty.com/about/awards and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/contact-us and https://loylty.com/about/privacy-policy have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://loylty.com/menu/about/policy.png.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 528 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 528 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 92 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at loylty.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
CtrlS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on loylty.com, including 15 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25