Website review, no card needed
loylty.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 76 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on loylty.com, 10 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 95 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Improve image delivery
700 ms · 4.2 MB39 images could be 4.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.6 MB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.6 MB).
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
730 ms · 75 KiBAbout 75 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 730 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 179 KiB and 136 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 84 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 425 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Leading transformation in customer engagement with technolo…”. Most of its time is resource load duration (3.1 s).
Speed Index: 9.0 s
9.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.307
0.307The layout shifts by 0.307 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 8.1 s
8.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.24
0.24For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
79 images without width and height
79 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 94 ms
94 msReal visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 33 ms
33 msScripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 117 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (100), scripts 314 KiB (11) and fonts 305 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
34 images in older formats
34 images (5.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
25 images below the first screen load straight away
25 images further down the page (3.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images far larger than shown
30 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example consumer-loyalty.png at 522 px wide, shown at 163 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.73 g of CO₂e: 207.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
16 images without alt text
16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
9 H1 headlines
There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Leading transformation in customer engagement wit…”, “Deliver customer delight,” and “Our expertise forged in a landscape of experience”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://loylty.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at loylty.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
50 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on loylty.com and 3 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Boost retention with brand loyalty programs powered by our consumer engagement platform and end-to-end loyalty program …”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Customer Engagement Technology Solutions | Loylty Rewardz”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://loylty.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (738 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
10 pages share a title
https://loylty.com/technology/lidsys-xlii, https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/who-we-are, https://loylty.com/about/clients and https://loylty.com/about/awards and 4 others all use the title “Loylty Rewardz”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages share a meta description
https://loylty.com/technology/lidsys-xlii, https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/who-we-are, https://loylty.com/about/clients and https://loylty.com/about/awards and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://loylty.com/technology/data-security, https://loylty.com/videos, https://loylty.com/about/contact-us and https://loylty.com/about/privacy-policy have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://loylty.com/menu/about/policy.png.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 528 words of copy
The homepage carries about 528 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 92 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at loylty.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- CtrlS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on loylty.com, including 15 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.