Website review, no card needed
ltse.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202636 issues · 88 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on ltse.com, 10 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 222 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 222 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 223 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 122 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.6 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.6 s
A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and osano.com and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 580 KiB6 images could be 580 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 850 ms
850 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 850 ms of main-thread work and 538 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 405 KiB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (405 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 75 KiBAbout 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
website-files.com adds 308 ms
308 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 308 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 384 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
osano.com adds 293 ms
293 msosano.com costs a phone 293 ms of main-thread work and 64 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hotjar adds 286 ms
286 msHotjar costs a phone 286 ms of main-thread work and 64 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Vimeo adds 101 ms
101 msVimeo costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 66 but mobile only 29. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 9.6 s
9.6 sThe first text or image appears after 9.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.9 s
12.9 sYour largest element takes 12.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Diverse people interact in a cityscape with trees, a wheelc…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s
1.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
25 images without width and height
25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 753 ms
753 msReal visitors wait 753 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 40% faster for real visitors
-40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 193 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 54% faster for real visitors
-54%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 123 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 123 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (35), images 687 KiB (24) and fonts 289 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (44 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.99 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 119.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 46 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
112 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 112 pages on ltse.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 125 characters
Your meta description is 125 characters: “LTSE is the innovative business ecosystem empowering visionary companies at all stages to drive long-term profit and pu…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “An ecosystem of leaders' leaders”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “The Long-Term Stock Exchange | LTSE”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ltse.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ltse.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://ltse.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (949 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://ltse.com/trading/market-maker, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
2 pages share a meta description
https://ltse.com/trading/why-trade and https://ltse.com/trading/platform-capabilities use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://ltse.com/listings/listed-companies, https://ltse.com/trading/resources, https://ltse.com/trading/membership and https://ltse.com/trading/product-data have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 646 words of copy
The homepage carries about 646 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Fee Schedule & Incentives”, “Trading Schedule” and “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ltse.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Teams
- Listings (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- ltse.com/about/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on ltse.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.