Website review, no card needed
m2.ru website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202636 issues · 83 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on m2.ru, 16 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 219 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 219 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 202 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
14.9 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 14.9 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.8 s · 1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.3 s
A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 1.1 MB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (yandex.ru, Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 1.2 MB and 897 ms of main-thread time.
yandex.ru adds 570 ms
570 msyandex.ru costs a phone 570 ms of main-thread work and 889 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 321 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,575 HTML elements
The page has 2,575 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
157 KiB8 images could be 157 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
61 KiBAbout 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Duplicated JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 28 ms
28 msYour server sent the HTML in 28 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.1 s
22.1 sYour largest element takes 22.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 37.7 s
37.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 37.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.7 s
12.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 164 ms
164 msReal visitors wait 164 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 685 ms
685 msReal visitors wait 685 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.2 MB in 218 requests
7.2 MBYour homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 218 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (80), images 2.1 MB (83) and stylesheets 510 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.03 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.03 g of CO₂e: 243.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
161 tap targets too small
161 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
12 form fields without a label
12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Метр квадратный (М2): новостройки, ипотека, сделки с недвижимостью”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (174 characters)
Your meta description is 174 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
243 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 243 pages on m2.ru and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://m2.ru/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://m2.ru/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://m2.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://m2.ru/personal-area is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://m2.ru/personal-area has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://m2.ru/personal-area has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
https://m2.ru/ipoteka, https://m2.ru/ipoteka/na-zhile-na-pervichnom-rynke, https://m2.ru/services/checkup and https://m2.ru/legal-advice have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
5 pages slow to respond
https://m2.ru/personal-area, https://m2.ru/ipoteka, https://m2.ru/ipoteka/na-zhile-na-pervichnom-rynke, https://m2.ru/services/checkup and https://m2.ru/legal-advice took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 190 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
5 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 third-party cookies
8 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
31 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 41 words
The homepage has only about 41 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at m2.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Gatsby
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- HLL
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on m2.ru, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.