Website review, no card needed

maap.cc logo

maap.cc website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202644 issues · 89 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on maap.cc, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
635 ms177 msMay 16Oct 31317 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026230 ms
May 23, 2026249 ms
May 30, 2026256 ms
Jun 6, 2026278 ms
Jun 13, 2026299 ms
Jun 20, 2026360 ms
Jun 27, 2026397 ms
Jul 4, 2026428 ms
Jul 11, 2026442 ms
Jul 18, 2026373 ms
Jul 25, 2026290 ms
Aug 1, 2026272 ms
Aug 8, 2026283 ms
Aug 15, 2026291 ms
Aug 22, 2026321 ms
Aug 29, 2026367 ms
Sep 5, 2026396 ms
Sep 12, 2026466 ms
Sep 19, 2026522 ms
Sep 26, 2026571 ms
Oct 3, 2026582 ms
Oct 10, 2026553 ms
Oct 17, 2026468 ms
Oct 24, 2026369 ms
Oct 31, 2026317 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maap.cc (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maap.cc at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. maap.cc at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. maap.cc at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. maap.cc at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. maap.cc at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. maap.cc at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. maap.cc at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. maap.cc at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

10 to fix28
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    29 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 28

    28/100

    Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    5.8 MB

    56 images could be 5.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ContentSquare and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 625 ms

    625 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 625 ms of main-thread work and 867 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 341 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (341 KiB).

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 272 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • ZenDesk adds 133 ms

    133 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 133 ms of main-thread work and 431 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 61 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 61 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 7 KiB

    7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 112 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.41

    0.41

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.41 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Seen at Speed.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.2 s

    33.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.392

    0.392

    The layout shifts by 0.392 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 773 ms

    773 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 773 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 296 ms

    296 ms

    Real visitors wait 296 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 317 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 53 images without width and height

    53 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 589 ms

    589 ms

    Real visitors wait 589 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 10.8 MB in 295 requests

    10.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.8 MB in 295 requests on a phone: images 7.2 MB (83), scripts 3.1 MB (94) and fonts 203 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    14 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example knwMpNuIowoCAEAC_ROAD_CLP_SH_HEADER_MOBILE_GAMMA.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 14 KiB.

  • About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.05 g of CO₂e: 366.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7789
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (84 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 84 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 106 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10091
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Seen at Speed.” and “Cycling Clothing”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 66 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on maap.cc and 14 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “We propel cycling forward with Australian cycling apparel that was born in Melbourne but made its mark the planet over.…”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “MAAP | Performance Cycling Apparel & Cycling Kits”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://maap.cc/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://maap.cc/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://maap.cc/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (248 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix62
  • 1 page without a title

    https://maap.cc/pages/careers has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    https://maap.cc/products/training-jersey-2-0-blue-ink and https://maap.cc/products/training-jersey-2-0-ash-pink all use the title “Training Jersey 2.0 - MAAP Cycling Apparel”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://maap.cc/pages/careers has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://maap.cc/bundles, https://maap.cc/about-us, https://maap.cc/pages/stockist and https://maap.cc/labs use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://maap.cc/pages/stockist, whose canonical is https://maap.cc/pages/undefined. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://maap.cc/collections/gamma, https://maap.cc/collections/alt-road, https://maap.cc/collections/aeon, https://maap.cc/collections/training, https://maap.cc/bundles and https://maap.cc/collections/core-icon and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://maap.cc/bundles, https://maap.cc/pages/stockist and https://maap.cc/labs have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://maap.cc/products/training-thermal-ls-jersey-2-0-pomegranate took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://d.adroll.com/uev/U3NP3TIEYFDLJNMXNDFNU5/YOTRPVE4H5FZ3MXNPL4AQU/?adroll_tpc=lx3%3Dlex-875dcf7e-8824-4efd-8dd5-36b3b8e5e127&af0=0fe6f973&adroll_fpc=54701731541b929209f7ee0339e59f9d-1794022704009.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    44 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 237 words

    The homepage has only about 237 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop US Store” and “Shop Man”.

  • 20 calls to action

    The homepage has 20 calls to action, for example “Shop Man”, “Shop Woman” and “Shop Alt_Road”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and TikTok Pixel.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maap.cc, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
6 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Headquarters
Port Melbourne

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on maap.cc, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25