Website review, no card needed

magticom.ge logo

magticom.ge website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 81 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on magticom.ge, 15 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms98 msMay 16Oct 31105 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202699 ms
May 23, 2026101 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026102 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 2026103 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026105 ms
Oct 24, 2026105 ms
Oct 31, 2026105 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of magticom.ge (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. magticom.ge at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. magticom.ge at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. magticom.ge at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. magticom.ge at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. magticom.ge at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. magticom.ge at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. magticom.ge at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. magticom.ge at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

5 to fix43
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    12.2 s · 3.6 MB

    35 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    8.6 s · 2.6 MB

    21 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.6 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    190 ms · 35 KiB

    About 35 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 86 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 161 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Your largest element takes 15.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “MESH Wi-Fi”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.687

    0.687

    The layout shifts by 0.687 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 105 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 83 ms

    83 ms

    Real visitors wait 83 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 437 ms

    437 ms

    Real visitors wait 437 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 43 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 43 requests on a phone: images 3.5 MB (32), fonts 86 KiB (3) and scripts 74 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 21 images in older formats

    21 images (3.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    416 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MESH-WIFI.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 338 px. Resized copies would save about 416 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (346 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 125.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8387
  • Positive tabindex

    50 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (31 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10084
  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “მთავარი / მაგთიკომი”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (205 characters)

    Your meta description is 205 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 142 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 142 pages on magticom.ge and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “მთავარი”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.magticom.ge/ka/home.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.magticom.ge/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.magticom.ge/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.magticom.ge/ka/internet and https://www.magticom.ge/ka/mobile/tariffs/mobile-internet-packages all use the title “ინტერნეტი / მაგთიკომი”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.magticom.ge/ka/fixed-line and https://www.magticom.ge/ka/mobile/tariffs/other-tariffs have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.magticom.ge/5g, whose canonical is https://www.magticom.ge/ka/home/5g. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.magticom.ge/5g has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    https://www.magticom.ge/ka/mobile, https://www.magticom.ge/ka/internet, https://www.magticom.ge/ka/tv, https://www.magticom.ge/ka/fixed-line, https://www.magticom.ge/ka/mobile/tariffs/unlimited-cocktails and https://www.magticom.ge/ka/mobile/tariffs/minute-packages and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 100 words

    The homepage has only about 100 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at magticom.ge, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Magticom Ltd.

Company

Founded
1996
Headquarters
Tbilisi

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on magticom.ge, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25