make.com website review

27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.1 MB).

5 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, website-files.com and Optanon and others), adding 6.2 MB and 449 ms of main-thread time.

Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

About 195 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

website-files.com costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 5.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

About 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

The page has 1,898 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

1 image could be 14 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

Desktop scores 87 but mobile only 61. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Real visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Build and manage AI agents and automations in one visual la…”.

The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

The page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Real visitors wait 299 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

50 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 70 requests on a phone: media 4.9 MB (1), scripts 598 KiB (20) and other files 502 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 215.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

The homepage links to 119 pages on make.com and 16 external pages.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

make.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

The homepage carries about 882 words of visible text.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.