Website review, no card needed
mammashop.dk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202631 issues · 86 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on mammashop.dk, 7 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 9.3 MB in 682 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
89B- #3,424 of 109,089 reviewed websitesbeats 95%
- #1,784 of 61,794 online storesbeats 95%
- #1,735 of 56,373 Shopify storesbeats 95%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 169 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.4 s
5.0 s
6.7 s
8.4 s
10.1 s
11.8 s
13.5 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 6.3 s
A phone's processor spends 6.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,690 HTML elements
The page has 4,690 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 664 KiBAbout 664 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.1 MB and 637 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 332 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (332 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
550 ms12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 362 KiB19 images could be 362 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 228 ms
228 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 228 ms of main-thread work and 537 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 153 ms
153 msShopify costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 676 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 112 ms
112 msKlaviyo costs a phone 112 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
52 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 52 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 101 ms
101 msYour server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.3 s
28.3 sYour largest element takes 28.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Maileg”.
Time to Interactive: 35.3 s
35.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.1 s
11.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 199 ms
199 msReal visitors wait 199 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 649 ms
649 msReal visitors wait 649 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 182 ms
182 msScripts block the page for only 182 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.3 MB in 682 requests
9.3 MBYour homepage downloads 9.3 MB in 682 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (279), scripts 1.7 MB (103) and other files 1.7 MB (263). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Banner_til_mobilos_9b0e3ad6-f833-4662-882b-d8395e312650.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.63 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.63 g of CO₂e: 316.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
17 links without text
17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
15 form fields without a label
15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 331 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://mamma-shop.com)”.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
987 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 987 pages on mammashop.dk and 1 external page.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Mammashop har et STORT udvalg i alt til den gravide kvinde, legetøj og babyudstyr med lynhurtig levering fra vores lage…”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Mammashop.dk → Køb alt til gravide, legetøj og babyudstyr her!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://mammashop.dk/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mammashop.dk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://mammashop.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,901 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://mammashop.dk/pages/wishlist has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://mammashop.dk/collections/ugens-prisbaskere, https://mammashop.dk/pages/wishlist, https://mammashop.dk/collections/alle-varer-pa-tilbud and https://mammashop.dk/collections/outlet have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://mammashop.dk/collections/alle-varer-pa-tilbud and https://mammashop.dk/collections/outlet took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
4 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “window.MinimogEvents.on is not a function https://mammashop.dk/cdn/shop/t/81/assets/cart-drawer.js?v=164870589405517810…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
41 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 331 words of copy
The homepage carries about 331 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop now”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Babyudstyr Giv baby den bedste start” and “Shop now”.
20 short forms
20 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mammashop.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Profitmetrics · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Returnflows · Multifeeds · Judge Me Reviews · Fbp Fast Bundle · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Orbe Geolocation · Hidepay · kxcdn.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on mammashop.dk, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.