Website review, no card needed

mangovapes.com logo

mangovapes.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202627 issues · 81 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on mangovapes.com, 7 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1000 ms767 msMay 16Oct 31834 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026973 ms
May 23, 2026946 ms
May 30, 2026912 ms
Jun 6, 2026889 ms
Jun 13, 2026865 ms
Jun 20, 2026848 ms
Jun 27, 2026863 ms
Jul 4, 2026875 ms
Jul 11, 2026927 ms
Jul 18, 2026933 ms
Jul 25, 2026916 ms
Aug 1, 2026906 ms
Aug 8, 2026883 ms
Aug 15, 2026887 ms
Aug 22, 2026916 ms
Aug 29, 2026944 ms
Sep 5, 2026973 ms
Sep 12, 2026968 ms
Sep 19, 2026956 ms
Sep 26, 2026940 ms
Oct 3, 2026869 ms
Oct 10, 2026854 ms
Oct 17, 2026823 ms
Oct 24, 2026794 ms
Oct 31, 2026834 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
81 ms78 msMay 16Oct 3180 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202679 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202678 ms
Jun 20, 202678 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202678 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202679 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202680 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms
Oct 10, 202679 ms
Oct 17, 202679 ms
Oct 24, 202679 ms
Oct 31, 202680 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mangovapes.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mangovapes.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mangovapes.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mangovapes.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. mangovapes.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. mangovapes.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. mangovapes.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. mangovapes.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. mangovapes.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix89
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 3,223 HTML elements

    The page has 3,223 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 2.1 MB

    60 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 89

    89/100

    Your mobile performance score is 89. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 253 KiB

    About 253 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Maps adds 136 ms

    136 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 136 ms of main-thread work and 333 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, Shopify and qikify.com and others), adding 806 KiB and 327 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    About 35 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    177 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (177 KiB).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 56 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 582 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Your largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 439 ms

    439 ms

    Real visitors wait 439 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 8 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 5.5 MB in 235 requests

    5.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 235 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (75), other files 1.2 MB (107) and scripts 835 KiB (45). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Geek_Bar_Pulse_X2_750x750_5c4b1fff-db39-4139-acaf-369e1a984e is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.56 g of CO₂e: 186.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7991
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • 425 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 425 pages on mangovapes.com and 10 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 139 characters

    Your meta description is 139 characters: “Ottawa's premier vape shop offering disposable vapes, e-liquids, and hardware from top brands. Same-day delivery availa…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Mango Vapes”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Mango Vapes | Same-Day Local Delivery | Ottawa”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mangovapes.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mangovapes.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,737 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.mangovapes.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.mangovapes.com/policies/refund-policy, https://www.mangovapes.com/policies/privacy-policy, https://www.mangovapes.com/policies/terms-of-service, https://www.mangovapes.com/collections/all and https://www.mangovapes.com/collections/nasty-juice-salt-30ml have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 182 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 95 small tap targets

    95 of 387 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 11 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,772 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,772 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US”, “HOW TO PLACE AN ORDER” and “Shop our products”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mangovapes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Multi Location Inv · Age Checker · Smart Menu · av-northern-apps.com · locationinventory.info

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on mangovapes.com, including 10 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25