Website review, no card needed
mansfield.energy website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202627 issues · 80 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on mansfield.energy, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 85 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
24.9 s · 4.9 MB2 images could be 4.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 24.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.4 s · 656 KiB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (656 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 601 KiBAbout 601 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, hsappstatic.net and Hubspot and others), adding 1.1 MB and 493 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 205 ms
205 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 205 ms of main-thread work and 304 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Vimeo adds 56 ms
56 msVimeo costs a phone 56 ms of main-thread work and 524 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 36.0 s
36.0 sYour largest element takes 36.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “READY TO TURN FUEL PROBLEMS INTO SOLUTIONS? NOW YOU CAN”.
Time to Interactive: 36.0 s
36.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 978 ms
978 msReal visitors wait 978 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 213 ms
213 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 213 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 89 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors
-30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.2 MB in 61 requests
7.2 MBYour homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 61 requests on a phone: images 5.6 MB (12), scripts 1.2 MB (18) and fonts 238 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.05 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.05 g of CO₂e: 246.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
25 text elements with low contrast
25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h3 → h5 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 23 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
21 links with vague text
21 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (262 characters)
Your meta description is 262 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
103 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 103 pages on mansfield.energy and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Ready to Turn Fuel Problems Into Solutions? NOW YOU CAN”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Fuel supply and logistics - Mansfield Energy”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://mansfield.energy/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mansfield.energy/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://mansfield.energy/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (925 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://mansfield.energy/solutions/sustainability is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 604 words of copy
The homepage carries about 604 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Learn More”.
23 calls to action
The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Learn more”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mansfield.energy, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Liquid Web, L.L.C
Company
- Employees
- 960
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on mansfield.energy, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.