Website review, no card needed
marquesderiscal.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202641 issues · 87 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on marquesderiscal.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 195 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 225 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 15.5 MB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15.5 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 390 KiBAbout 390 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Cookie-Script.com and others), adding 22.0 MB and 810 ms of main-thread time.
Instagram adds 0 ms
0 msInstagram costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 20.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 1.3 MB17 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Legacy JavaScript
650 ms · 27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 562 ms
562 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 562 ms of main-thread work and 644 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 40 KiBAbout 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 200 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 828 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 110 ms
110 msYour server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 51.6 s
51.6 sYour largest element takes 51.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Le informamos de que este sitio web, cuyo responsable y tit…”.
Time to Interactive: 55.4 s
55.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 55.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 218 ms
218 msReal visitors wait 218 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
44 images without width and height
44 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 384 ms
384 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 384 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 225 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 528 ms
528 msReal visitors wait 528 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015
0.015The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 44.4 MB in 84 requests
44.4 MBYour homepage downloads 44.4 MB in 84 requests on a phone: media 27.7 MB (7), images 15.4 MB (45) and scripts 987 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 6.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
21 images in older formats
21 images (7.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
20 images below the first screen load straight away
20 images further down the page (2.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 12.6 g of CO₂ per visit
12.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.58 g of CO₂e: 1509.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (12 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (85 characters)
Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Herederos del Marqués de Riscal - Vinos con carácter de Rioja, Rueda, Castilla y León”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Visita el mejor viñedo del mundo”, “Éxito de Sublimme by Riscal, el primer vino espum…” and “Marqués de Riscal prolonga la vida de sus viñedos”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Invalid hreflang
Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
89 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 89 pages on marquesderiscal.com and 30 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “Bodegas de los Herederos del Marqués de Riscal. Amor y respeto por el vino desde 1858 - Vinos originales, frescos, eleg…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.marquesderiscal.com/portada.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.marquesderiscal.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.marquesderiscal.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages share a meta description
https://www.marquesderiscal.com/nuestra-historia, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/la-botelleria, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/100-organic, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/denominaciones-marques-de-riscal, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/do-ca-rioja and https://www.marquesderiscal.com/do-rueda and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 535 words of copy
The homepage carries about 535 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marquesderiscal.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on marquesderiscal.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.