Website review, no card needed

marquesderiscal.com logo

marquesderiscal.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202641 issues · 87 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on marquesderiscal.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.8 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
230 ms188 msMay 2Oct 17225 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026195 ms
May 9, 2026194 ms
May 16, 2026193 ms
May 23, 2026193 ms
May 30, 2026194 ms
Jun 6, 2026198 ms
Jun 13, 2026201 ms
Jun 20, 2026205 ms
Jun 27, 2026205 ms
Jul 4, 2026205 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026203 ms
Aug 1, 2026199 ms
Aug 8, 2026200 ms
Aug 15, 2026196 ms
Aug 22, 2026203 ms
Aug 29, 2026208 ms
Sep 5, 2026214 ms
Sep 12, 2026221 ms
Sep 19, 2026221 ms
Sep 26, 2026222 ms
Oct 3, 2026223 ms
Oct 10, 2026224 ms
Oct 17, 2026225 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of marquesderiscal.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. marquesderiscal.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. marquesderiscal.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. marquesderiscal.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. marquesderiscal.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. marquesderiscal.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. marquesderiscal.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. marquesderiscal.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. marquesderiscal.com at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 15.5 MB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 390 KiB

    About 390 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Cookie-Script.com and others), adding 22.0 MB and 810 ms of main-thread time.

  • Instagram adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Instagram costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 20.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 1.3 MB

    17 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    650 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 562 ms

    562 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 562 ms of main-thread work and 644 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 40 KiB

    About 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 200 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 828 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 51.6 s

    51.6 s

    Your largest element takes 51.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Le informamos de que este sitio web, cuyo responsable y tit…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 55.4 s

    55.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 55.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 218 ms

    218 ms

    Real visitors wait 218 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 44 images without width and height

    44 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 384 ms

    384 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 384 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 225 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 528 ms

    528 ms

    Real visitors wait 528 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015

    0.015

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 44.4 MB in 84 requests

    44.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 44.4 MB in 84 requests on a phone: media 27.7 MB (7), images 15.4 MB (45) and scripts 987 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 6.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 21 images in older formats

    21 images (7.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 20 images below the first screen load straight away

    20 images further down the page (2.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 12.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    12.58 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.58 g of CO₂e: 1509.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8592
  • Images must have alternative text (12 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7780
  • Title is long (85 characters)

    Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Herederos del Marqués de Riscal - Vinos con carácter de Rioja, Rueda, Castilla y León”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Visita el mejor viñedo del mundo”, “Éxito de Sublimme by Riscal, el primer vino espum…” and “Marqués de Riscal prolonga la vida de sus viñedos”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 89 internal links, 30 external

    The homepage links to 89 pages on marquesderiscal.com and 30 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Bodegas de los Herederos del Marqués de Riscal. Amor y respeto por el vino desde 1858 - Vinos originales, frescos, eleg…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.marquesderiscal.com/portada.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.marquesderiscal.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.marquesderiscal.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 13 pages share a meta description

    https://www.marquesderiscal.com/nuestra-historia, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/la-botelleria, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/100-organic, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/denominaciones-marques-de-riscal, https://www.marquesderiscal.com/do-ca-rioja and https://www.marquesderiscal.com/do-rueda and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9686
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 535 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 535 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marquesderiscal.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on marquesderiscal.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25