Website review, no card needed

martincodax.com logo

martincodax.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202634 issues · 77 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on martincodax.com, 13 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.0 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms84 msMay 2Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026106 ms
May 9, 2026102 ms
May 16, 2026100 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026101 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202690 ms
Jul 4, 202691 ms
Jul 11, 202689 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 202688 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202690 ms
Aug 15, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202689 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202689 ms
Sep 19, 202693 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of martincodax.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. martincodax.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. martincodax.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. martincodax.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. martincodax.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. martincodax.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. martincodax.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. martincodax.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. martincodax.com at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

5 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 MB

    4 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 81). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 83 KiB

    About 83 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 96 ms

    96 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 96 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 35 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Google Analytics), adding 401 KiB and 166 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    129 KiB

    About 129 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 60 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 246 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 103 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “CADA SORBO ESCONDE LA ESENCIA DE NUESTRO MAR”.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.17

    0.17

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.164

    0.164

    The layout shifts by 0.164 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Real visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 542 ms

    542 ms

    Real visitors wait 542 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 36% faster for real visitors

    -36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 7 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 5.6 MB in 59 requests

    5.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 59 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (11), scripts 751 KiB (31) and fonts 751 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example image00012-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (2.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    slider-home.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (94 characters)

    Your title is 94 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Bodegas Martín Códax. Tienda online vino albariño, enoturismo y eventos - Bodegas Martín …”.

  • 41 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 41 pages on martincodax.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Tienda online de las bodegas Martín Códax. Vino albariño D.O. Rías Baixas, aguardiente, licor café, entradas Os Xoves d…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Cada sorbo esconde la esencia de nuestro mar”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.martincodax.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.martincodax.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (384 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.martincodax.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 53 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.martincodax.com/en and https://www.martincodax.com/gl all use the title “HOME - Bodegas Martín Códax”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.martincodax.com/blog, https://www.martincodax.com/contacto, https://www.martincodax.com/en, https://www.martincodax.com/gl, https://www.martincodax.com/feder and https://www.martincodax.com/trabaja-con-nosotros have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.martincodax.com/contacto and https://www.martincodax.com/feder have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 205 words

    The homepage has only about 205 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martincodax.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
1986
Headquarters
Vilariño

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on martincodax.com, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25