Website review, no card needed
masachips.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202648 issues · 90 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on masachips.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #85,500 of 92,081 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #47,063 of 48,826 online storesbeats 3%
- #42,752 of 44,011 Shopify storesbeats 2%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 261 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 425 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 471 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 499 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 496 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 497 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 478 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.8 s
4.3 s
5.7 s
7.1 s
8.5 s
9.9 s
11.3 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Main-thread work: 13.3 s
A phone's processor spends 13.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 14
14/100Your mobile performance score is 14. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, alia-prod.com and Klaviyo and others), adding 3.0 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 649 KiB23 images could be 649 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
250 ms · 762 KiB52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (762 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 713 ms
713 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 713 ms of main-thread work and 850 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 421 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
alia-prod.com adds 302 ms
302 msalia-prod.com costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 753 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 229 ms
229 msKlaviyo costs a phone 229 ms of main-thread work and 507 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,712 HTML elements
The page has 2,712 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
rebuyengine.com adds 158 ms
158 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 158 ms of main-thread work and 300 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 99 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 99 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 143 KiBAbout 143 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s
9.9 sYour largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 17.6 s
17.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.5 s
41.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.6 s
2.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.346
0.346The layout shifts by 0.346 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 449 ms
449 msReal visitors wait 449 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 84% slower for real visitors
+84%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 261 ms to 478 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 558 ms
558 msReal visitors wait 558 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.0 MB in 483 requests
7.0 MBYour homepage downloads 7.0 MB in 483 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (151), images 1.6 MB (62) and other files 1.1 MB (221). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images far larger than shown
576 KiB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IMG_3850_1-polaroid.webp at 1,425 px wide, shown at 291 px. Resized copies would save about 576 KiB.
13 images in older formats
13 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (1,018 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.98 g of CO₂e: 237.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
54 form fields without a label
54 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Nothing Beats A Tallow-Cooked Crunch” and “Three Things Set MASA Apart...”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
97 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 97 pages on masachips.com and 15 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 86 characters
Your meta description is 86 characters: “Seed-oil free, traditional tortilla chips made with corn, tallow, and salt— that's it.”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “MASA - Traditional Tortilla Chips – MASA Chips”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.masachips.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.masachips.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,629 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.masachips.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.masachips.com/pages/faq has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-cobanero, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-white, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-blue, https://www.masachips.com/collections/chips, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-chips and https://www.masachips.com/pages/about and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 pages with very little text
https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-cobanero, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-white, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-blue, https://www.masachips.com/collections/chips, https://www.masachips.com/products/masa-chips and https://www.masachips.com/blogs/recipes and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://arttrk.com/pixel/?ad_log=referer&action=content&pixid=d423e373-2e45-4e79-a35f-1832e979a866.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
22 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,856 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,856 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now” and “Shop Bundles”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “SHOP ALL”, “Buy MASA” and “Contact”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 93 testimonial or review blocks, 22 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 1 trust badge and “1,000,000+ Customers”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
44 cookies set on arrival
44Opening the homepage sets 44 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
83 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 83 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at masachips.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 26 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Checkmate · Microsoft Clarity · Minmaxify Order Limits · Postscript Sms Marketing · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Mntn · Sc Easy Redirects · Okendo · Triplewhale · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Test Sms · Applovin Shop Integration · Zipifypages · Zipify Oneclickupsell · Twitter Multi Pixels · superfiliate-cdn.com · aliyuncs.com · bogos.io · rebuyengine.com · cloudfront.net · 9gtb.com · govx.com · klck.dev · onetext.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Hiring
- Hiring
- 11 open roles
- Teams
- Operations (3), Maintenance (1), Maintenance / Production (1), Production (1)
- Job board
- breezy
- Careers page
- ancient-crunch.breezy.hr (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on masachips.com, including 26 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.