Website review, no card needed

mass.co.uk logo

mass.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202630 issues · 79 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on mass.co.uk, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s833 msMay 9Oct 241.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms68 msMay 9Oct 1771 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202670 ms
May 16, 202670 ms
May 23, 202672 ms
May 30, 202678 ms
Jun 6, 202685 ms
Jun 13, 202686 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202678 ms
Jul 4, 202672 ms
Jul 11, 202677 ms
Jul 18, 202677 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202674 ms
Aug 15, 202678 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202677 ms
Sep 5, 202675 ms
Sep 12, 202675 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202671 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202670 ms
Oct 17, 202671 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mass.co.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mass.co.uk at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mass.co.uk at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. mass.co.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. mass.co.uk at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. mass.co.uk at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. mass.co.uk at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. mass.co.uk at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. mass.co.uk at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

6 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    2 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 198 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (198 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 104 KiB

    About 104 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Google CDN and others), adding 289 KiB and 236 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 78 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 298 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Your largest element takes 8.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “UK defence personnel being given a software tutorial by MASS”.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 73 ms

    73 ms

    Real visitors wait 73 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 394 ms

    394 ms

    Real visitors wait 394 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026

    0.026

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 49 ms

    49 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 49 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    106-MASS_Lincoln-8162_2500px.jpg weighs 1.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    1.2 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 106-MASS_Lincoln-8162_2500px.jpg at 2,500 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.

  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 35 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 35 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (9), scripts 324 KiB (10) and fonts 122 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 19 links without text

    19 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h3 → h5 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9273
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • Meta description is long (172 characters)

    Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at mass.co.uk/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 66 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on mass.co.uk and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We make your data inform faster, work harder, stay safer. Giving you the edge.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mass.co.uk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mass.co.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mass.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (734 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do, https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services, https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services/ew-training, https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services/ew-training-courses, https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services/mission-data-management and https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services/countermeasures and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.mass.co.uk/what-we-do/cema-and-ew-services/mission-planning has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 155 words

    The homepage has only about 155 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Download Brochure” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mass.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on mass.co.uk, including 10 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25