Website review, no card needed

masterofcode.com logo

masterofcode.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202645 issues · 111 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on masterofcode.com, 18 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.1 s5.1 sMay 16Oct 315.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.4 s
May 23, 20265.3 s
May 30, 20265.2 s
Jun 6, 20265.5 s
Jun 13, 20265.6 s
Jun 20, 20265.6 s
Jun 27, 20265.6 s
Jul 4, 20265.7 s
Jul 11, 20265.5 s
Jul 18, 20265.7 s
Jul 25, 20265.8 s
Aug 1, 20265.7 s
Aug 8, 20266.0 s
Aug 15, 20266.0 s
Aug 22, 20265.7 s
Aug 29, 20265.6 s
Sep 5, 20265.3 s
Sep 12, 20265.3 s
Sep 19, 20265.4 s
Sep 26, 20265.4 s
Oct 3, 20265.6 s
Oct 10, 20265.6 s
Oct 17, 20265.8 s
Oct 24, 20265.8 s
Oct 31, 20265.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
166 ms114 msMay 16Oct 31122 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026140 ms
May 23, 2026140 ms
May 30, 2026136 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026139 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026152 ms
Jul 25, 2026147 ms
Aug 1, 2026160 ms
Aug 8, 2026160 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026133 ms
Sep 5, 2026135 ms
Sep 12, 2026155 ms
Sep 19, 2026155 ms
Sep 26, 2026159 ms
Oct 3, 2026140 ms
Oct 10, 2026125 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms
Oct 24, 2026120 ms
Oct 31, 2026122 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

12 to fix41
  • Render-blocking requests

    10.9 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 10.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    6.2 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 212 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (212 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,937 HTML elements

    The page has 3,937 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and cdn-cookieyes.com and others), adding 1.3 MB and 994 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 520 ms

    520 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 520 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 393 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 73 KiB

    73 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 302 ms

    302 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 369 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    80 KiB

    5 images could be 80 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 208 ms

    208 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 208 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Real visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Your largest element takes 13.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “CONSULTING-LED AI ENGINEERING PARTNER We Build Custom AI So…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.2 s

    30.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 540 ms

    540 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 540 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 122 ms

    122 ms

    Real visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.5 MB in 183 requests

    6.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 183 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (38), stylesheets 1.6 MB (23) and images 1.4 MB (91). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (640 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (28 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.83 g of CO₂e: 220.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8693
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (47 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 47 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 17 form fields without a label

    17 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 133 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Master of Code Global”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 16 links with vague text

    16 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at masterofcode.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 262 internal links, 24 external

    The homepage links to 262 pages on masterofcode.com and 24 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “AI consulting-led engineering partner for mid-market and large companies. Full-cycle, from idea to production. 1000+ pr…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We Build Custom AI Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://masterofcode.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://masterofcode.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,169 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix62
  • 11 pages without a title

    /portfolio, /ai-sdlc, /ai-development-services, /hire-ai-engineers, /ai-agent-development-services and /conversational-ai-services and 5 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    /ai-pilot%20 and /ai-pilot all use the title “AI Pilot Services | Master of Code Global”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    /portfolio, /ai-sdlc, /ai-development-services, /hire-ai-engineers, /ai-agent-development-services and /conversational-ai-services and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /ai-pilot%20 and /ai-pilot use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /ai-pilot%20, whose canonical is /ai-pilot. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    /portfolio, /ai-sdlc, /ai-development-services, /hire-ai-engineers, /ai-agent-development-services and /conversational-ai-services and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /ai-pilot%20 and /careers took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 95 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'upgrade-insecure-requests' is ignored when delivered in a report-only policy.”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://phoenix.arize.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (masterofcode.com).

  • Valid certificate (74 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for masterofcode.com and is valid for another 74 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://masterofcode.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    masterofcode.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    masterofcode.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    masterofcode.com was registered in Feb 2007 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2030

    masterofcode.com is registered until Feb 2030.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • A 12-field form

    Your longest form asks for 12 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,630 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,630 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “TALK TO US”.

  • 21 calls to action

    The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “Book a Free Scoping Call”, “Get in touch” and “TALK TO US”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating, 3 trust badges and “8k+ Users”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:amazonses.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.elementor 4.3.5 → 4.3.6

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on masterofcode.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25