Website review, no card needed
matetic.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202656 issues · 97 checks
This review found 56 issues worth fixing on matetic.com, 25 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 174 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 196 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.8 s · 16.2 MB51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.6 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.6 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 582 KiBAbout 582 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 295 KiBAbout 295 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 3.6 MB21 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
900 ms · 148 KiB148 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 258 ms
258 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 258 ms of main-thread work and 422 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 977 KiB and 457 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 133 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Document request latency
40 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 438 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 50 ms
50 msYour server sent the HTML in 50 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.7 s
4.7 sReal visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sThe first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s
9.8 sYour largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ARE YOU OF LEGAL DRINKING AGE IN YOUR COUNTRY?”.
Speed Index: 9.7 s
9.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.1 s
12.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 255 ms
255 msReal visitors wait 255 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors
+46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 181 ms
181 msScripts block the page for only 181 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.0 MB in 65 requests
17.0 MBYour homepage downloads 17.0 MB in 65 requests on a phone: media 9.6 MB (2), images 5.5 MB (32) and scripts 1.1 MB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
20 images in older formats
20 images (5.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
17 images below the first screen load straight away
17 images further down the page (4.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images far larger than shown
400 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example valle-del-rosario.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 391 px. Resized copies would save about 400 KiB.
About 4.8 g of CO₂ per visit
4.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.81 g of CO₂e: 577.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
25 images without alt text
25 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 13 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
9 H1 headlines
There are 9 <h1> headlines (“La auténtica expresión, nace en equilibrio con la…”, “Viña Matetic, huella indeleble de una naturaleza …” and “Origen de clima costero”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
74 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 74 pages on matetic.com and 19 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 36 characters
Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Matetic Vineyards – Wines from Chile”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://matetic.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://matetic.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (654 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
12 pages share 3 titles
/, https://matetic.com/es and https://matetic.com/en all use the title “Matetic Vineyards – Wines from Chile”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages without a meta description
https://matetic.com/es, https://matetic.com/en, https://matetic.com/zh, https://matetic.com/nosotros, https://matetic.com/nosotros/en-que-creemos and https://matetic.com/nosotros/equipo and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 7 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://matetic.com/nosotros/en-que-creemos, whose canonical is https://matetic.com/nosotros. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages slow to respond
https://matetic.com/es, https://matetic.com/nosotros/en-que-creemos, https://matetic.com/nosotros/equipo, https://matetic.com/nosotros/familia, https://matetic.com/nosotros/nuestra-historia and https://matetic.com/terroir/valle-del-rosario and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 538 words of copy
The homepage carries about 538 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 4 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at matetic.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 56 issues on matetic.com, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.