Website review, no card needed

matrackinc.com logo

matrackinc.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202638 issues · 92 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on matrackinc.com, 12 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s3.2 sMay 2Oct 173.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.5 s
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms92 msMay 2Oct 17119 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026106 ms
May 9, 2026104 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 2026101 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026120 ms
Jun 27, 2026118 ms
Jul 4, 2026108 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 2026118 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026127 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026105 ms
Sep 12, 2026116 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026119 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of matrackinc.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. matrackinc.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. matrackinc.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. matrackinc.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. matrackinc.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. matrackinc.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. matrackinc.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  7. matrackinc.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  8. matrackinc.com at 7.6 s7.6 s

Speed

11 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 733 KiB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (733 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    867 KiB

    About 867 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 614 ms

    614 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 614 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 258 ms

    258 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 258 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 267 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,113 HTML elements

    The page has 2,113 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • omappapi.com adds 92 ms

    92 ms

    omappapi.com costs a phone 92 ms of main-thread work and 331 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    200 ms · 151 KiB

    3 images could be 151 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    202 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    43 KiB

    43 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 141 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.6 s

    20.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Your largest element takes 5.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “FMCSA-REGISTERED ELD SOC 2 · ISO 27001 30-DAY RISK-FREE Tra…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.4 s).

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 689 ms

    689 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 689 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 126 ms

    126 ms

    Real visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.058

    0.058

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.058, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 105 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 105 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (57), other files 521 KiB (14) and images 486 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (38 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.07 g of CO₂e: 128.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (141 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 141 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8386
  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 56 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on matrackinc.com and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Matrack telematics powers fleets with GPS tracking, ELD, and dash cams—streamline operations, ensure compliance, and cu…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Track what matters. Vehicles, assets, drivers, uptime.”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Matrack Inc. | Telematics, GPS Tracking & ELD for Fleets”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://matrackinc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://matrackinc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,327 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://matrackinc.com/shopping-cart-eld is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://matrackinc.com/dealerpro, https://matrackinc.com/industries, https://matrackinc.com/secureviewpro, https://matrackinc.com/quote, https://matrackinc.com/shopping-cart-eld and https://matrackinc.com/schedule-eld-meeting and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://matrackinc.com/reseller/client/gps-activation, https://matrackinc.com/schedule-eld-meeting and https://matrackinc.com/10-min-dashcam-overview-meeting have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://matrackinc.com/blogs took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix95
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 2,327 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,327 words of visible text.

9 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Order Now” and “Book a 20-Min FREE Consultation”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Get a quote”, “Order Now” and “Book a 20-Min FREE Consultation”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 24 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 2 trust badges and “1,250+ reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at matrackinc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on matrackinc.com, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25