Website review, no card needed

maty.com logo

maty.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 110 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on maty.com, 14 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
148 ms128 msMay 9Oct 24144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026133 ms
May 23, 2026131 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026131 ms
Jun 13, 2026133 ms
Jun 20, 2026135 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026142 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026144 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026139 ms
Aug 8, 2026138 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026145 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix74
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 74

    74/100

    Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Document request latency

    700 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 700 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 98 KiB

    About 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    684 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 684 ms on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 304 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,115 HTML elements

    The page has 2,115 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 993 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 784 ms

    784 ms

    Your server takes 784 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 192 KiB

    About 192 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (weglot.com, iAdvize SAS and cdn-api-weglot.com), adding 135 KiB and 190 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    115 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (115 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    19 KiB

    2 images could be 19 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Your largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 576 ms

    576 ms

    Real visitors wait 576 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 191 ms

    191 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 191 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (137 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.38 g of CO₂e: 45.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 88 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 88 requests on a phone: scripts 618 KiB (19), images 448 KiB (38) and fonts 123 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

14 to fixGoogle 8285
  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (12 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 108 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 277 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 277 pages on maty.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Découvrez MATY, bijouterie en ligne depuis 1951 : bagues, montres, colliers & bracelets. Des créations qui racontent vo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Bijouterie en ligne MATY”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Bijouterie en ligne MATY : créations à offrir depuis 1951”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.maty.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.maty.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,049 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix60
  • 1 page without a title

    /offre-du-moment-sis.html has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    /offre-du-moment-sis.html and /bagues-femme/bagues-femme.html/NW-1711-type-de-pierres~diamant(s)/NW-1711-type-de-pierres~diamant-synthetique are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    /bagues-femme/bagues-femme.html and /bagues-femme/bagues-femme.html/NW-1706-type-de-bague~chevaliere all use the title “Bagues femme or, argent & tendances – paiement 3x | MATY”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /offre-du-moment-sis.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /bagues-femme/bagues-femme.html and /bagues-femme/bagues-femme.html/NW-1706-type-de-bague~chevaliere use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /offre-du-moment-sis.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 182 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://instagram.com/maty_officiel/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (maty.com).

  • Valid certificate (126 days left)

    The certificate from Gandi SAS · GandiCert verifies for maty.com and is valid for another 126 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://maty.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 49 links work

    All 49 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    maty.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    maty.com was registered in Jun 1996 through Gandi SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, sectigo.com, amazon.com and symantec.com to issue certificates for maty.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    maty.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,409 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,409 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix40
  • No DMARC policy

    maty.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 40/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:83.206.188.0/26 include:spf.fcnet.fr include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on maty.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25