Website review, no card needed

mcit.gov.sa logo

mcit.gov.sa website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202649 issues · 89 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on mcit.gov.sa, 21 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.7 s3.7 sMay 16Oct 313.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20264.9 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20265.0 s
Jun 13, 20265.0 s
Jun 20, 20265.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.5 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.7 s
Aug 8, 20264.9 s
Aug 15, 20265.1 s
Aug 22, 20265.3 s
Aug 29, 20265.3 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.3 s
Sep 19, 20265.4 s
Sep 26, 20265.3 s
Oct 3, 20265.3 s
Oct 10, 20265.0 s
Oct 17, 20264.5 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
103 ms85 msMay 16Oct 3193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202688 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202689 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 2026101 ms
Oct 10, 2026100 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202695 ms
Oct 31, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mcit.gov.sa (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mcit.gov.sa at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. mcit.gov.sa at 3.1 s3.1 s
  3. mcit.gov.sa at 4.6 s4.6 s
  4. mcit.gov.sa at 6.2 s6.2 s
  5. mcit.gov.sa at 7.7 s7.7 s
  6. mcit.gov.sa at 9.2 s9.2 s
  7. mcit.gov.sa at 10.8 s10.8 s
  8. mcit.gov.sa at 12.3 s12.3 s

Speed

10 to fix52
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.4 s · 5.6 MB

    158 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    8.9 s

    79 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.9 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.1 s · 1.6 MB

    5 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.7 s · 486 KiB

    About 486 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 320 KiB

    About 320 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and ReadSpeaker and others), adding 537 KiB and 656 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    450 ms · 77 KiB

    77 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 360 ms

    360 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 402 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 199 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    57 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 508 ms

    508 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 508 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    Your largest element takes 14.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “National Technology Development Program …”. Most of its time is resource load duration (5.8 s).

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 202 ms

    202 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 202 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 93 ms

    93 ms

    Real visitors wait 93 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 6.2 MB in 189 requests

    6.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 189 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (26), fonts 1.9 MB (6) and scripts 843 KiB (56). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (32 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.75 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.75 g of CO₂e: 210.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8688
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (53 characters)

    Your meta description is only 53 characters: “Ministry of Communications and Information Technology”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“National Technology Development Program” and “Communications and Information Technology Law”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 94 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on mcit.gov.sa and 26 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Ministry of Communications and Information Technology”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://mcit.gov.sa/en.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mcit.gov.sa/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://mcit.gov.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,393 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix69
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://mcit.gov.sa/en/node/add/contact_us is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://mcit.gov.sa/ar all use the title “وزارة الاتصالات وتقنية المعلومات”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://mcit.gov.sa/en/organizational-structure, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/mcit-agency, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/budget, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/e-participation, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/participation-policy and https://mcit.gov.sa/en/MCITOD and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    / and https://mcit.gov.sa/ar use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://mcit.gov.sa/ar. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://mcit.gov.sa/en/node/241905, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/strategy-ministry-communications-and-information-technology, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/organizational-structure, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/mcit-agency, https://mcit.gov.sa/en/budget and https://mcit.gov.sa/en/node/249978 and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    / and https://mcit.gov.sa/ar have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://dga.gov.sa/themes/custom/dga/Images/NDS/DGA-logo-icon.svg.

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,101 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,101 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Get in Touch”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mcit.gov.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Etihad Etisalat, a joint stock company

Company

Founded
1926
Headquarters
Riyadh

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on mcit.gov.sa, including 20 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25