Website review, no card needed
medal.tv website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202628 issues · 77 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on medal.tv, 9 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 28.9 MB in 279 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 216 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 249 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.8 s
A phone's processor spends 9.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
737 KiB48 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (737 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
600 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 391 ms
391 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 391 ms of main-thread work and 375 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 387 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 149 ms
149 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 149 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
aditude.io adds 141 ms
141 msaditude.io costs a phone 141 ms of main-thread work and 319 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 202 KiB4 images could be 202 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 85 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 27.1 s
27.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sYour largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 335 ms
335 msReal visitors wait 335 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 211 ms to 249 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 712 ms
712 msReal visitors wait 712 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017
0.017The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 28.9 MB in 279 requests
28.9 MBYour homepage downloads 28.9 MB in 279 requests on a phone: media 24.7 MB (21), scripts 3.3 MB (98) and images 552 KiB (73). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
82 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example roblox.jeElwA7MFmtrMBD7CcXFVQaYcAg=.png at 256 px wide, shown at 12 px. Resized copies would save about 82 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (122 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (157 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 8.2 g of CO₂ per visit
8.18 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.18 g of CO₂e: 981.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Record, Edit, and Share Your Game Clips & Gameplay - Medal | Medal.tv”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Record and share game clips” and “Record and share game clips”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
41 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 41 pages on medal.tv and 12 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 110 characters
Your meta description is 110 characters: “Medal is the best way to record, edit, and share gaming clips and videos for free on PC. Download Medal today.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://medal.tv/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage and Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://medal.tv/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://medal.tv/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (631 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without an H1
https://medal.tv/games and https://medal.tv/careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages with very little text
https://medal.tv/support, https://medal.tv/compare, https://medal.tv/download/ios and https://medal.tv/download/android have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 663 words of copy
The homepage carries about 663 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download Medal”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Download”, “Download Medal” and “Download Windows”.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
36 cookies set on arrival
36Opening the homepage sets 36 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
61 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 61 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Didomi
A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at medal.tv, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
Hiring
- Hiring
- 17 open roles
- Teams
- General Intuition & Medal (17)
- Job board
- ashby
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on medal.tv, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.