Website review, no card needed
melento.ai website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202639 issues · 104 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on melento.ai, 17 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
16.4 s · 3.5 MB16 images could be 3.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s28 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 257 KiBAbout 257 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, weglot.com and jQuery CDN and others), adding 876 KiB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 766 ms
766 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 766 ms of main-thread work and 444 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 96 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96 KiB).
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 583 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Duplicated JavaScript
350 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 31 KiBAbout 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.3 s
5.3 sReal visitors wait 5.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.5 s
32.5 sYour largest element takes 32.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 32.5 s
32.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.6 s
9.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 835 ms
835 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 835 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
26 images without width and height
26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 185 ms
185 msReal visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.4 MB in 114 requests
5.4 MBYour homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 114 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (29), scripts 815 KiB (27) and stylesheets 130 KiB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
mel10.png weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images in older formats
6 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
186 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example mel10.png at 1,076 px wide, shown at 329 px. Resized copies would save about 186 KiB.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.53 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.53 g of CO₂e: 184.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (39 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 39 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
15 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 15 pages on melento.ai and 1 external page.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “Experience document automation with Melento's Low-Code AI, Smart CLM, esign & Digital Onboarding solutions. Book a free…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “10 Years. 3,000+ Enterprises. One mission: Make work smarter”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Low-Code AI, eSign, CLM & Digital Onboarding Solutions | Melento”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://melento.ai/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://melento.ai/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (983 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “AOS is not defined”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://signdesk.com/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (melento.ai).
Valid certificate (167 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for melento.ai and is valid for another 167 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://melento.ai redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 11 links work
All 11 links checked from your homepage (10 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
melento.ai has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
melento.ai's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 1 year old
1 yearmelento.ai was registered in May 2025 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
melento.ai is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 770 words of copy
The homepage carries about 770 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Demo” and “Learn More”.
17 calls to action
The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Start now” and “Learn More”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, 18 customer or partner logos, 9 trust badges and “Join 3000+ Businesses”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and LinkedIn Insight.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be melento.ai is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:zoho.in include:transmail.net.in include:spf.zohomail360.i…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on melento.ai, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.