Website review, no card needed

mercuryz.com logo

mercuryz.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202632 issues · 74 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on mercuryz.com, 11 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of mercuryz.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mercuryz.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mercuryz.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mercuryz.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. mercuryz.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. mercuryz.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. mercuryz.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. mercuryz.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. mercuryz.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

7 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    29.4 s · 12.0 MB

    93 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.0 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    44 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 178 KiB

    About 178 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 64). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    636 KiB

    8 images could be 636 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    440 ms · 43 KiB

    About 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 440 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare CDN and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 541 KiB and 154 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 88 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 738 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 48.9 s

    48.9 s

    Your largest element takes 48.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your Build Is Only as Fast as Your Workforce. We Make Sure …”.

  • Speed Index: 21.0 s

    21.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.4 s

    50.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 38 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.5 MB in 104 requests

    12.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 104 requests on a phone: images 11.3 MB (18), scripts 550 KiB (31) and fonts 535 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 4.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    514 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Verizon-Logo-1.png at 1,600 px wide, shown at 179 px. Resized copies would save about 514 KiB.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (5.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (5.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.54 g of CO₂e: 425.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9293
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Home New - MercuryZ telecom-broadband-and-BEAD-workforce-solutions”.

  • 66 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on mercuryz.com and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 125 characters

    Your meta description is 125 characters: “Scale with Mercury Z’s telecom, broadband and BEAD workforce solutions. Expert technicians for nationwide network deplo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your Build Is Only as Fast as Your Workforce. We Make Sure It’s Never the Bottleneck.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mercuryz.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mercuryz.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mercuryz.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,803 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.mercuryz.com/field-assessments-audits-and-surveys and https://www.mercuryz.com/services-data-center-services all use the title “Field Assessments, Audits & Surveys | MercuryZ”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.mercuryz.com/workforce-solutions has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mercuryz.com/field-assessments-audits-and-surveys and https://www.mercuryz.com/services-data-center-services use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://www.mercuryz.com/industries-telecommunications-carriers, https://www.mercuryz.com/industries-bead-recipients-and-implementation-partners, https://www.mercuryz.com/field-assessments-audits-and-surveys, https://www.mercuryz.com/dwdm-optical-transport-engineering, https://www.mercuryz.com/noc-support-for-enterprise-networks-carrier-customers and https://www.mercuryz.com/services-new-technology-implementation took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 457 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 457 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Call Center Services”, “Contact” and “Request Workforce Support”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mercuryz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on mercuryz.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25