Website review, no card needed

metaflow.de logo

metaflow.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 85 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on metaflow.de, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
252 ms167 msMay 16Oct 31235 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026177 ms
May 23, 2026180 ms
May 30, 2026185 ms
Jun 6, 2026189 ms
Jun 13, 2026191 ms
Jun 20, 2026191 ms
Jun 27, 2026195 ms
Jul 4, 2026198 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026209 ms
Jul 25, 2026212 ms
Aug 1, 2026217 ms
Aug 8, 2026219 ms
Aug 15, 2026220 ms
Aug 22, 2026220 ms
Aug 29, 2026220 ms
Sep 5, 2026228 ms
Sep 12, 2026235 ms
Sep 19, 2026242 ms
Sep 26, 2026242 ms
Oct 3, 2026237 ms
Oct 10, 2026233 ms
Oct 17, 2026229 ms
Oct 24, 2026234 ms
Oct 31, 2026235 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of metaflow.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. metaflow.de at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. metaflow.de at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. metaflow.de at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. metaflow.de at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. metaflow.de at 6.1 s6.1 s
  6. metaflow.de at 7.3 s7.3 s
  7. metaflow.de at 8.6 s8.6 s
  8. metaflow.de at 9.8 s9.8 s

Speed

13 to fix44
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 4.7 MB

    43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 1,000 KiB

    About 1,000 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 3.3 MB

    9 images could be 3.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Sentry, Klaviyo and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Sentry adds 959 ms

    959 ms

    Sentry costs a phone 959 ms of main-thread work and 77 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 95 KiB

    About 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 78 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 78 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 353 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 180 ms

    180 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 180 ms of main-thread work and 319 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • LoyaltyLion adds 61 ms

    61 ms

    LoyaltyLion costs a phone 61 ms of main-thread work and 367 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Your largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.5 s

    34.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 177 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 191 ms

    191 ms

    Real visitors wait 191 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 466 ms

    466 ms

    Real visitors wait 466 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 12.9 MB in 334 requests

    12.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.9 MB in 334 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (51), media 4.3 MB (6) and scripts 2.8 MB (140). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    141 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example navi-mobile-erfahrungsberichte-collage-comp.webp at 390 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 141 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (94 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.67 g of CO₂e: 439.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 17 images without alt text

    17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9295
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Dein Abnehm-Shake² Starter-Set” and “Dein Abnehm-Shake² Starter-Set”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 66 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on metaflow.de and 11 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “Probiere den leckersten Stoffwechsel-Shake* der Welt! Ab 1,99 € pro Mahlzeit ✓ Weniger als 1g Zucker pro Portion ✓ Made…”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Stoffwechsel-Shake* mit Konzept | MetaFlow”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://metaflow.de/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://metaflow.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,358 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    /customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    /products/riegel and /customer_authentication/redirect are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /pages/referral, /pages/rezepte and /customer_authentication/redirect have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /customer_authentication/redirect took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 3 broken images

    3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97130510&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=fba53e40-c758-4a66-8c1b-4b55adc806f3&bo=3&sid=d2ccecd0d84f11f19429cf5395a2a86f&vid=d2cd1320d84f11f1a7b3d506bd8f2811&vids=0&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <path> attribute d: Expected number, "… 11.9888 7.00002H11.6667 7.00002…".”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,230 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,230 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 14 trackers load before any consent

    14

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 9 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 35 cookies set on arrival

    35

    Opening the homepage sets 35 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 64 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 64 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at metaflow.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Judge Me Reviews · Microsoft Clarity · Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Stape Remix · conversionbear.com · linkster.co

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on metaflow.de, including 19 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25