Website review, no card needed

metservice.com logo

metservice.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202647 issues · 77 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on metservice.com, 21 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s4.4 sMay 9Oct 244.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.5 s
May 16, 20264.6 s
May 23, 20264.7 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.7 s
Jun 13, 20264.8 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.5 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.5 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.5 s
Aug 29, 20264.5 s
Sep 5, 20264.5 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.6 s
Sep 26, 20264.7 s
Oct 3, 20264.7 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.7 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
213 ms187 msMay 9Oct 24210 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026191 ms
May 16, 2026190 ms
May 23, 2026194 ms
May 30, 2026202 ms
Jun 6, 2026207 ms
Jun 13, 2026210 ms
Jun 20, 2026203 ms
Jun 27, 2026201 ms
Jul 4, 2026201 ms
Jul 11, 2026201 ms
Jul 18, 2026205 ms
Jul 25, 2026209 ms
Aug 1, 2026205 ms
Aug 8, 2026205 ms
Aug 15, 2026205 ms
Aug 22, 2026203 ms
Aug 29, 2026202 ms
Sep 5, 2026203 ms
Sep 12, 2026204 ms
Sep 19, 2026204 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026207 ms
Oct 10, 2026208 ms
Oct 17, 2026209 ms
Oct 24, 2026210 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of metservice.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. metservice.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. metservice.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. metservice.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. metservice.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. metservice.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. metservice.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. metservice.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. metservice.com at 8.4 s8.4 s

Speed

11 to fix16
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 728 KiB

    60 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (728 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 16

    16/100

    Your mobile performance score is 16. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and YouTube and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 372 ms

    372 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 372 ms of main-thread work and 1,000 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 383 ms

    383 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 787 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 384 ms

    384 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 384 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    404 KiB

    4 images could be 404 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 259 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    160 ms · 130 KiB

    About 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    49 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.28

    1.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.6 s

    19.6 s

    Your largest element takes 19.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “1 Warning, 1 Watch View all”.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.195

    1.195

    The layout shifts by 1.195 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 243 ms

    243 ms

    Real visitors wait 243 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 565 ms

    565 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 565 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 191 ms to 210 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 508 ms

    508 ms

    Real visitors wait 508 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 261 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 261 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (56), other files 934 KiB (114) and images 693 KiB (52). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (124 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (124 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.50 g of CO₂e: 180.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7988
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (12 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9263
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.metservice.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “MetService - Te Ratonga Tirorangi”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 490 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.metservice.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 23 third-party cookies

    23 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ERROR - (ox_esp) Call to OX failedSyntaxError: Failed to execute 'json' on 'Response': Unexpected end of JSON input”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 490 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 490 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at metservice.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
216
Founded
1992
Headquarters
Wellington

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on metservice.com, including 23 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25