Website review, no card needed
mgeko.cc website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202630 issues · 69 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on mgeko.cc, 11 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 5.3 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 117 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, onclckinpg.com and acscdn.com and others), adding 774 KiB and 922 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 278 ms
278 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 178 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
onclckinpg.com adds 252 ms
252 msonclckinpg.com costs a phone 252 ms of main-thread work and 214 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.186
0.186The layout shifts by 0.186 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 135 ms
135 msReal visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 766 ms
766 msReal visitors wait 766 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 95 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 95 requests on a phone: images 3.5 MB (33), scripts 645 KiB (18) and fonts 321 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
placeholder.gif weighs 854 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
976 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example placeholder.gif at 600 px wide, shown at 122 px. Resized copies would save about 976 KiB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (854 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.30 g of CO₂e: 155.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “www.mgeko.cc - Enjoy reading”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
40 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 40 pages on mgeko.cc and 0 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “At Our site you can read manga. manhwa, manhua completely free with english interface and without any ads, Welcome to w…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mgeko.cc/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mgeko.cc/sitemap_2.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
57%The HTML your server sends has 252 of the 442 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mgeko.cc/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.mgeko.cc/jumbo/manga and https://www.mgeko.cc/browse-comics are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.mgeko.cc/jumbo/manga, https://www.mgeko.cc/browse-comics and https://www.mgeko.cc/privacy-policy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
70 of 74 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 442 words of copy
The homepage carries about 442 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “check Apply”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mgeko.cc, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on mgeko.cc, including 8 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.