Website review, no card needed
mgu.edu.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202641 issues · 81 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on mgu.edu.in, 18 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 204 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.9 s · 36.4 MB79 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (36.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.5 s · 6.0 MB19 images could be 6.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 334 KiBAbout 334 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 6.0 s
A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 885 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
900 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 900 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 279 ms
279 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 522 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
JSDelivr CDN adds 274 ms
274 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 274 ms of main-thread work and 233 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 128 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.4 s
16.4 sYour largest element takes 16.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “MGU Campus”.
Time to Interactive: 16.5 s
16.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s
3.1 sThe first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
42 images without width and height
42 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.147
0.147The layout shifts by 0.147 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
3 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 226 ms to 204 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 140 ms
140 msScripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 37.3 MB in 120 requests
37.3 MBYour homepage downloads 37.3 MB in 120 requests on a phone: media 22.6 MB (6), images 13.5 MB (56) and scripts 940 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images over 500 KB
11 images weigh 7.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
28 images far larger than shown
5.5 MB28 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Home page 1.jpg at 1,900 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 5.5 MB.
25 images in older formats
25 images (10.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
32 images below the first screen load straight away
32 images further down the page (9.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 10.6 g of CO₂ per visit
10.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.57 g of CO₂e: 1267.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
9 tap targets too small
9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://mgu.edu.in/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
123 internal links, 29 external
The homepage links to 123 pages on mgu.edu.in and 29 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “MGU Meghalaya - Best University In North East, MGU provides the best quality education to its students. With skilled le…”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “MGU Meghalaya - Best University In North East”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mgu.edu.in/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://mgu.edu.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,175 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://mgu.edu.in/programs/program-details/1 and https://mgu.edu.in/programs/program-details/5 all use the title “program details”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://mgu.edu.in/programs/program-details/1 and https://mgu.edu.in/programs/program-details/5 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://mgu.edu.in/about/the-university, https://mgu.edu.in/about/act_and_statutes_or_moa, https://mgu.edu.in/about/institutional_development_plan, https://mgu.edu.in/about/mission-and-vision, https://mgu.edu.in/about/governance and https://mgu.edu.in/about/approval-and-recognition and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://mgu.edu.in/blog took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 732 words of copy
The homepage carries about 732 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Download Brochure”, “Contact Us” and “Apply Now”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 17 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mgu.edu.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- GoDaddy
Company
- Founded
- 1983
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on mgu.edu.in, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.