Website review, no card needed

minebea-intec.com logo

minebea-intec.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202636 issues · 105 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on minebea-intec.com, 16 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
170 ms108 msMay 9Oct 24152 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026119 ms
May 23, 2026118 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026131 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026127 ms
Aug 1, 2026124 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026156 ms
Sep 5, 2026163 ms
Sep 12, 2026163 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026148 ms
Oct 3, 2026139 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026151 ms
Oct 24, 2026152 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of minebea-intec.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. minebea-intec.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. minebea-intec.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. minebea-intec.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. minebea-intec.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. minebea-intec.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. minebea-intec.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. minebea-intec.com at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. minebea-intec.com at 8.8 s8.8 s

minebea-intec.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix64
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    84.2 s · 30.8 MB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (30.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    81.8 s · 30.1 MB

    8 images could be 30.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 81.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64 (desktop: 66). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 80 KiB

    About 80 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,408 HTML elements

    The page has 2,408 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 201 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    About 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, MyFonts and Mynewsdesk), adding 408 KiB and 30 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 330 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 65 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 86.8 s

    86.8 s

    Your largest element takes 86.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 29.6 s

    29.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 29.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 128.5 s

    128.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 128.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 152 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 56 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix28
  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 30.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 31.2 MB in 44 requests

    31.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 31.2 MB in 44 requests on a phone: images 30.9 MB (20), scripts 233 KiB (11) and fonts 69 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    20.1 MB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example csm_hero_img4_2ad1561411.png at 2,436 px wide, shown at 398 px. Resized copies would save about 20.1 MB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (395 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.85 g of CO₂e: 1061.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8490
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 322 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 322 pages on minebea-intec.com and 16 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 120 characters

    Your meta description is 120 characters: “Leading manufacturer of industrial weighing and inspection technologies. Find out more about our products and solutions.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Leading manufacturer of industrial weighing and inspection technologies”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Industrial weighing and inspection technologies – Minebea Intec”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.minebea-intec.com/en/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.minebea-intec.com/en/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,772 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 6 pages share 2 titles

    /en, /in, /uk and /us all use the title “Industrial weighing and inspection technologies – Minebea Intec”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /en/pf has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /in, /uk and /us use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /en/pf has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /en/pf has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /es took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    26 of 30 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://spareparts.minebea-intec.com/ (503).

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 182 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://minebea-intec.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://minebeaintec.sharepoint.com/Extranet/Partner_Portal/default.aspx.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (minebea-intec.com).

  • Valid certificate (52 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for minebea-intec.com and is valid for another 52 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://minebea-intec.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    minebea-intec.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    minebea-intec.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 10 years old

    10 years

    minebea-intec.com was registered in Feb 2016 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2027

    minebea-intec.com is registered until Feb 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 2,349 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,349 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Learn more about load cells”, “Learn more” and “To the load cell shop”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 30 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:83.135.57.0/27 ip4:159.69.61.97 ip4:83.236.209.112/29 ip4:159.69.61.97/32 ip4:149.72.203.251 ip4:138.201.83.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Hosting
TTM

Company

Founded
2014

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on minebea-intec.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25