Website review, no card needed
miresiduo.app website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202633 issues · 76 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on miresiduo.app, 16 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.6 s
3.3 s
4.9 s
6.5 s
8.2 s
9.8 s
11.5 s
13.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
13.2 s · 3.9 MB106 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
Render-blocking requests
11.9 s40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
6.6 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.6 s faster on a phone.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and leadster.com.br and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
900 ms · 140 KiB140 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Google Tag Manager adds 861 ms
861 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 861 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 240 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiB23 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Document request latency
108 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
66 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 66 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 420 ms
420 msYour server sent the HTML in 420 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 13.8 s
13.8 sThe first text or image appears after 13.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.8 s
18.8 sYour largest element takes 18.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “miResiduo entrega indicadores ESG, mejora la gestión de la …”.
Speed Index: 19.5 s
19.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.8 s
33.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 517 ms
517 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 517 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 147 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 147 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (63), stylesheets 1.4 MB (37) and images 937 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (88 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.60 g of CO₂e: 192.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
54 text elements with low contrast
54 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (6 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
7 images without alt text
7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (39 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 39 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - miResiduo”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (374 characters)
Your meta description is 374 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
38 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 38 pages on miresiduo.app and 23 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.miresiduo.app/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.miresiduo.app/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.miresiduo.app/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (836 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.miresiduo.app/blog has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.miresiduo.app/blog, https://www.miresiduo.app/transp-recep and https://www.miresiduo.app/generador have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.miresiduo.app/generador and https://www.miresiduo.app/que-son-los-cookies took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 low-resolution images
3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 750 words of copy
The homepage carries about 750 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “QUIERO UNA DEMO”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “QUIERO UNA DEMO”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miresiduo.app, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Locaweb Servicos de Internet S/A
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on miresiduo.app, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.