Website review, no card needed

mnautism.org logo

mnautism.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202626 issues · 70 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on mnautism.org, 10 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms69 msMay 9Oct 2478 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202684 ms
May 16, 202681 ms
May 23, 202680 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202677 ms
Jun 13, 202675 ms
Jun 20, 202678 ms
Jun 27, 202680 ms
Jul 4, 202682 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202685 ms
Jul 25, 202685 ms
Aug 1, 202684 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202673 ms
Aug 22, 202674 ms
Aug 29, 202677 ms
Sep 5, 202674 ms
Sep 12, 202680 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202678 ms
Oct 10, 202671 ms
Oct 17, 202671 ms
Oct 24, 202678 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mnautism.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mnautism.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mnautism.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mnautism.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. mnautism.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. mnautism.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. mnautism.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. mnautism.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. mnautism.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix68
  • Improve image delivery

    10.6 s · 5.6 MB

    7 images could be 5.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    39 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 244 KiB

    About 244 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify JavaScript

    600 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 47 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (47 KiB).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and bloomerang.co and others), adding 473 KiB and 171 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 93 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 338 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.5 s

    32.5 s

    Your largest element takes 32.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.5 s

    33.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Real visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 84 ms to 78 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 53 ms

    53 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 53 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 8.0 MB in 95 requests

    8.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 95 requests on a phone: images 6.8 MB (12), scripts 617 KiB (29) and fonts 444 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.26 g of CO₂e: 271.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9081
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 8 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 11 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 8 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is short (22 characters)

    Your title is only 22 characters: “Homepage - MAC Midwest”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 75 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 75 pages on mnautism.org and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “Minnesota’s leader in compassionate autism and neurodevelopmental care. Assessments, ABA therapy, and integrated behavi…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “we got you”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mnautism.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mnautism.org/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mnautism.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://www.mnautism.org/who-we-are, https://www.mnautism.org/our-team, https://www.mnautism.org/board-of-directors, https://www.mnautism.org/foundation-board, https://www.mnautism.org/careers and https://www.mnautism.org/news-articles and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 5 words

    The homepage has only about 5 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Start with Support Now” and “Learn More About Who We Are”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mnautism.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
InMotion Hosting, Inc.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on mnautism.org, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25