Website review, no card needed

movingintelligence.nl logo

movingintelligence.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202633 issues · 101 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on movingintelligence.nl, 11 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 171.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
105 ms87 msMay 2Oct 17103 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202689 ms
May 9, 202689 ms
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202693 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202689 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202690 ms
Aug 15, 202691 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202693 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 2026101 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms
Oct 17, 2026103 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

7 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 588 KiB

    About 588 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • 3,064 HTML elements

    The page has 3,064 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 55). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, PageSense and Cookiebot and others), adding 893 KiB and 699 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 518 ms

    518 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 518 ms of main-thread work and 565 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 316 KiB

    10 images could be 316 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 222 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    72 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (72 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    16 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 124 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Your largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Knowledge in motion Al ruim 25 jaar partner in slimme mobil…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.1 s).

  • Speed Index: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 866 ms

    866 ms

    Real visitors wait 866 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 31 images without width and height

    31 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 332 ms

    332 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 332 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 89 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Real visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 194 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 194 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (27), images 649 KiB (17) and other files 256 KiB (143). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (416 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    103 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example small_bmw_logo_logo_png_transparent_d2a7e0ee91.png at 500 px wide, shown at 40 px. Resized copies would save about 103 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (150 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.75 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.75 g of CO₂e: 89.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9296
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10092
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 62 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 62 pages on movingintelligence.nl and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “Al 25 jaar marktleider in slimme soft- en hardware voor voertuigbeveiliging, rittenregistratie en wagenparkbeheer. Effi…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Knowledge in motion”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Waar beweging is, daar zijn wij | Moving Intelligence”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://strapi.movingintelligence.nl/api/sitemap/index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (718 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix57
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /voertuigbeveiliging/voertuigvolgsysteem, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    /dealer-pagina and /rittenregistratie are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /zoeken has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /zoek-een-dealer and /dealer-pagina use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /demo-boeken has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /zoeken has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    /voertuigbeveiliging, /voertuigbeveiliging/startonderbreker, /rittenregistratie, /rittenregistratie-app, /rittenregistratie/belastingdienst and /demo-boeken and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'textContent')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix75
  • 2 broken links to your own pages

    2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://movingintelligence.nl/zoek-een-dealer (500).

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (movingintelligence.nl).

  • Valid certificate (50 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for movingintelligence.nl and is valid for another 50 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://movingintelligence.nl redirects to the secure version.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    movingintelligence.nl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    movingintelligence.nl was registered in Jun 2010 through The Registrar Company B.V.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    movingintelligence.nl's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 675 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 675 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Boek een demo”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.123formbuilder.com ip4:37.114.89.80/28 ip4:37.114.89.88 include:…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 33 issues on movingintelligence.nl, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25