Website review, no card needed

moztech.cc logo

moztech.cc website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202642 issues · 107 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on moztech.cc, 12 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 28.4 MB in 471 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.4 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms104 msMay 16Oct 31130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026118 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026110 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026118 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026119 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026120 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026126 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms
Oct 24, 2026126 ms
Oct 31, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of moztech.cc (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. moztech.cc at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. moztech.cc at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. moztech.cc at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. moztech.cc at 5.1 s5.1 s
  5. moztech.cc at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. moztech.cc at 7.6 s7.6 s
  7. moztech.cc at 8.9 s8.9 s
  8. moztech.cc at 10.1 s10.1 s

moztech.cc does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix73
  • Main-thread work: 5.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, easychat.co and zotabox.com and others), adding 26.3 MB and 876 ms of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 452 ms

    452 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 452 ms of main-thread work and 25.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 73

    73/100

    Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    709 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (709 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    410 ms · 162 KiB

    About 162 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 410 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    496 KiB

    About 496 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • easychat.co adds 280 ms

    280 ms

    easychat.co costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 587 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    281 KiB

    12 images could be 281 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,893 HTML elements

    The page has 1,893 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 250 ms.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 242 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 606 ms

    606 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 606 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Your largest element takes 3.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 118 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Real visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 780 ms

    780 ms

    Real visitors wait 780 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.019

    0.019

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.019, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 28.4 MB in 471 requests

    28.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 28.4 MB in 471 requests on a phone: media 24.7 MB (4), scripts 1.6 MB (228) and other files 999 KiB (190). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    20261030-_-banner-mob.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    45 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 05_2.png at 1,500 px wide, shown at 293 px. Resized copies would save about 45 KiB.

  • About 8.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.05 g of CO₂e: 965.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7688
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 18 links without text

    18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“MOZTECH 墨子科技”, “霧面。高透。滑順。” and “萬能充MAX”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 150 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 150 pages on moztech.cc and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “行動電源推薦品牌,提供多款人氣熱銷型號,支援MagSafe無線充電與快充技術,滿足iPhone與安卓手機充電需求。可另外加購高硬度螢幕保護貼、穩固筆電支架,提升日常行動裝備體驗! 𝗠𝗢𝗭𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛® 我們所做的每件事 都是在挑…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “MOZTECH墨子科技|創造最前衛的黑科技產品 行動電源專家 快速為你的手機充電 – MOZTECH 墨子科技”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.moztech.cc/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.moztech.cc/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (274 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 2 pages share a title

    /products/moztech-%E7%8D%A8%E5%AE%B6%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9-%E6%99%B6%E9%9C%A7%E8%B2%BC-%E9%9B%BB%E7%AB%B6%E5%B0%88%E7%94%A8-iphone-%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%B7%E8%B2%BC and /products/moztech-iphone16-series-mist all use the title “MOZTECH® 墨子科技|【獨家專利】晶霧貼 電競專用 iPhone 保護貼 – MOZTECH 墨子科技”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    /collections/buy1get1, /collections/mist-glass-protector, /collections/privacy-screen-protector, /pages/%E8%B2%BC%E8%86%9C%E7%A5%9E%E5%99%A8%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E, /products/iphone-18-series-3d-mist-glassprotector and /products/iphone-17-series-3d-cold-sculpture-crystal-mist-gaming-screen-protector and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /products/moztech-%E7%8D%A8%E5%AE%B6%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9-%E6%99%B6%E9%9C%A7%E8%B2%BC-%E9%9B%BB%E7%AB%B6%E5%B0%88%E7%94%A8-iphone-%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%B7%E8%B2%BC and /products/moztech-iphone16-series-mist use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /collections/%E6%89%80%E6%9C%89%E5%95%86%E5%93%81, whose canonical is /collections/%e6%89%80%e6%9c%89%e5%95%86%e5%93%81. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /collections/%E6%89%80%E6%9C%89%E5%95%86%E5%93%81, /collections/mist-glass-protector, /collections/privacy-screen-protector, /collections/%E7%84%A1%E8%89%B2%E6%8A%97%E8%97%8D%E5%85%89%E6%99%B6%E9%9C%A7%E8%B2%BC, /collections/moztech-%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%B7%E8%B2%BC%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97 and /pages/%E8%B2%BC%E8%86%9C%E7%A5%9E%E5%99%A8%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /pages/%E8%B2%BC%E8%86%9C%E7%A5%9E%E5%99%A8%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'frame-ancestors' is ignored when delivered via a <meta> element.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    22 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (moztech.cc).

  • Valid certificate (52 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for moztech.cc and is valid for another 52 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://moztech.cc redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 45 links work

    All 45 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    moztech.cc's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 5 years old

    5 years

    moztech.cc was registered in Jul 2021 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only ssl.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for moztech.cc, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    moztech.cc is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 178 words

    The homepage has only about 178 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “日常好物 Shop”, “充電器/充電線/無線充 Shop” and “防窺保護貼 Shop”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be moztech.cc is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.moztech.cc include:amazonses.com include:mailgun.org ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on moztech.cc, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25