Website review, no card needed
mtl.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202634 issues · 80 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on mtl.org, 13 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 46. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 123 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.6 s
A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.3 MB27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
4.1 MB11 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Didomi and Clarity and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 589 KiBAbout 589 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 629 ms
629 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 629 ms of main-thread work and 662 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 281 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 47 ms
47 msYour server sent the HTML in 47 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 12.1 s
12.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 18.0 s
18.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sThe first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 817 ms
817 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 817 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sYour largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Experience Montréal”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.4 s).
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 962 ms
962 msReal visitors wait 962 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 123 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 169 ms
169 msReal visitors wait 169 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.5 MB in 200 requests
7.5 MBYour homepage downloads 7.5 MB in 200 requests on a phone: images 5.4 MB (25), scripts 1.6 MB (108) and fonts 325 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 4.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
4.3 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 58312.jpg at 3,840 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.3 MB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (5.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.11 g of CO₂e: 253.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (227 characters)
Your meta description is 227 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found ((untyped), BreadcrumbList, ItemList and Organization) but with 2 problems, for example “block has no @type”.
38 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 38 pages on mtl.org and 20 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Experience Montréal”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Experience Montréal | Tourisme Montréal”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mtl.org/en/node/89231.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mtl.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mtl.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (614 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.mtl.org/en/our-picks has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mtl.org/fr, whose canonical is https://www.mtl.org/fr/node/89231. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.mtl.org/en/what-to-do/spring took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 843 words of copy
The homepage carries about 843 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Order now Order now”, “Learn more Learn more” and “Subscribe to the newsletter”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, The Trade Desk and Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Didomi
A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mtl.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- SvelteKit
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Netlify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on mtl.org, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.