Website review, no card needed
mueblespergo.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 87 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on mueblespergo.com, 18 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #64,026 of 104,401 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #40,615 of 58,435 online storesbeats 26%
- #38,500 of 53,215 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 161 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.9 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
5,438 HTML elements
The page has 5,438 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Clarity and others), adding 874 KiB and 665 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
350 ms · 311 KiB10 images could be 311 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 394 ms
394 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 394 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
316 KiBAbout 316 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
71 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (71 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
26 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s
11.7 sYour largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hasta 30% + 20% Off y hasta 24 meses sin intereses”.
Time to Interactive: 19.7 s
19.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 217 ms
217 msReal visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 65% slower for real visitors
+65%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 161 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 615 ms
615 msReal visitors wait 615 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 189 ms
189 msScripts block the page for only 189 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 324 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 324 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (132), scripts 1.1 MB (97) and other files 705 KiB (78). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
40 images in older formats
40 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
BANNERS_WEB-04_162fdace-aaad-4d80-8b6f-a1e8e43c4a46.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
91 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example interfaz_WA_2.webp at 343 px wide, shown at 65 px. Resized copies would save about 91 KiB.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 172.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (5 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
334 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 334 pages on mueblespergo.com and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 106 characters
Your meta description is 106 characters: “Encuentra muebles exclusivos para renovar tu hogar y aprovecha el mejor precio desde ahora. Aprovecha hoy.”.
Title: 38 characters
Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Adelántate al Buen Fin | Muebles Pergo”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mueblespergo.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mueblespergo.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,227 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.mueblespergo.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/mesas-interior, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillas-interior and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/bancos-interior all use the title “Comedores modernos y premium | Muebles Pergo – Muebles Pergo”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.mueblespergo.com/pages/nuestras-sucursales has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages share a meta description
https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofas/sofas, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/love-seats/loveseats, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/escuadras/escuadras, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofa-camas and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/mesas-de-centro-1/Mesas-De-Centro and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales, whose canonical is https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/sillones-individuales. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.mueblespergo.com/pages/nuestras-sucursales, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofas/sofas, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/love-seats/loveseats, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/escuadras/escuadras, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofa-camas and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 154 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
16 small tap targets
16 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 910 words of copy
The homepage carries about 910 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 6 email links.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mueblespergo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on mueblespergo.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.