Website review, no card needed

mueblespergo.com logo

mueblespergo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 87 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on mueblespergo.com, 18 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 172.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
165 ms129 msMay 2Oct 17161 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026137 ms
May 9, 2026134 ms
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026136 ms
Jun 6, 2026136 ms
Jun 13, 2026137 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026155 ms
Jul 11, 2026160 ms
Jul 18, 2026155 ms
Jul 25, 2026150 ms
Aug 1, 2026143 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026140 ms
Sep 5, 2026142 ms
Sep 12, 2026143 ms
Sep 19, 2026142 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026146 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026161 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mueblespergo.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mueblespergo.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. mueblespergo.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. mueblespergo.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. mueblespergo.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. mueblespergo.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  6. mueblespergo.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  7. mueblespergo.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  8. mueblespergo.com at 6.2 s6.2 s

Speed

9 to fix60
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • 5,438 HTML elements

    The page has 5,438 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 5.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Clarity and others), adding 874 KiB and 665 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 311 KiB

    10 images could be 311 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 394 ms

    394 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 394 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 49 KiB

    About 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    316 KiB

    About 316 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    71 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (71 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Your largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hasta 30% + 20% Off y hasta 24 meses sin intereses”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.7 s

    19.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 217 ms

    217 ms

    Real visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 65% slower for real visitors

    +65%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 161 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 615 ms

    615 ms

    Real visitors wait 615 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 189 ms

    189 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 189 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix42
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 324 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 324 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (132), scripts 1.1 MB (97) and other files 705 KiB (78). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    BANNERS_WEB-04_162fdace-aaad-4d80-8b6f-a1e8e43c4a46.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    91 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example interfaz_WA_2.webp at 343 px wide, shown at 65 px. Resized copies would save about 91 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 172.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7487
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (5 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9290
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 334 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 334 pages on mueblespergo.com and 15 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 106 characters

    Your meta description is 106 characters: “Encuentra muebles exclusivos para renovar tu hogar y aprovecha el mejor precio desde ahora. Aprovecha hoy.”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Adelántate al Buen Fin | Muebles Pergo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mueblespergo.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mueblespergo.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,227 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.mueblespergo.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/mesas-interior, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillas-interior and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/bancos-interior all use the title “Comedores modernos y premium | Muebles Pergo – Muebles Pergo”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.mueblespergo.com/pages/nuestras-sucursales has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofas/sofas, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/love-seats/loveseats, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/escuadras/escuadras, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofa-camas and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/mesas-de-centro-1/Mesas-De-Centro and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales, whose canonical is https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/sillones-individuales. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.mueblespergo.com/pages/nuestras-sucursales, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofas/sofas, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/love-seats/loveseats, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/escuadras/escuadras, https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sillones-individuales/Sillones-Individuales and https://www.mueblespergo.com/collections/sofa-camas and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 154 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 910 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 910 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 6 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mueblespergo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on mueblespergo.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25