Website review, no card needed
multicare.dk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202620 issues · 76 checks
This review found 20 issues worth fixing on multicare.dk, 7 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #20,536 of 90,102 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #12,688 of 47,259 online storesbeats 67%
- #239 of 2,178 WooCommerce storesbeats 86%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 964 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 966 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Google Tag Manager adds 268 ms
268 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,765 HTML elements
The page has 2,765 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-cookieyes.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 354 KiB and 272 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 144 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
143 KiBAbout 143 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
98 KiB2 images could be 98 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
5 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 97
97/100Your mobile performance score is 97 (desktop: 97). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 1.8 s
A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 694 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 117 ms
117 msYour server sent the HTML in 117 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 368% slower for real visitors
+368%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 6.0 s
6.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.9 s
3.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 109 ms
109 msReal visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 111 ms
111 msScripts block the page for only 111 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sYour largest element renders in 1.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Her hos MultiCare er vi specialister i sanseintegration og …”.
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.26 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.26 g of CO₂e: 30.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 922 KiB in 68 requests
922 KiBYour homepage downloads 922 KiB in 68 requests on a phone: scripts 519 KiB (48), images 168 KiB (5) and fonts 146 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
167 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 167 pages on multicare.dk and 0 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “Hos MultiCare er vi specialister i sanseintegration og har lavet over 450 sanserum. Besøg vores webshop med mere end 20…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Velkommen”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Sanserum og andre hjælpemidler - Multicare”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.multicare.dk/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.multicare.dk/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (612 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/shop has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
15 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 746 words of copy
The homepage carries about 746 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multicare.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 20 issues on multicare.dk, including 10 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.