Website review, no card needed

multicare.dk logo

multicare.dk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202620 issues · 76 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on multicare.dk, 7 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s327 msApr 25Oct 104.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 2026964 ms
May 2, 2026966 ms
May 9, 20261.1 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20264.4 s
May 30, 20265.2 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.7 s
Jun 27, 20265.0 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.3 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms81 msApr 25Oct 10104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026102 ms
May 2, 2026110 ms
May 9, 2026119 ms
May 16, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 2026102 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 2026100 ms
Jul 18, 2026101 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026115 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026102 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026108 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of multicare.dk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. multicare.dk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. multicare.dk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. multicare.dk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. multicare.dk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. multicare.dk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. multicare.dk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. multicare.dk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. multicare.dk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix97
  • Google Tag Manager adds 268 ms

    268 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,765 HTML elements

    The page has 2,765 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-cookieyes.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 354 KiB and 272 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 144 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    143 KiB

    About 143 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    98 KiB

    2 images could be 98 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    5 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 97

    97/100

    Your mobile performance score is 97 (desktop: 97). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 694 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 117 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Real visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.17

    0.17

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 368% slower for real visitors

    +368%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Real visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 111 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Her hos MultiCare er vi specialister i sanseintegration og …”.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.26 g of CO₂e: 30.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 922 KiB in 68 requests

    922 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 922 KiB in 68 requests on a phone: scripts 519 KiB (48), images 168 KiB (5) and fonts 146 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9094
  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 167 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 167 pages on multicare.dk and 0 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Hos MultiCare er vi specialister i sanseintegration og har lavet over 450 sanserum. Besøg vores webshop med mere end 20…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Velkommen”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Sanserum og andre hjælpemidler - Multicare”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.multicare.dk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.multicare.dk/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (612 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /shop has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 746 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 746 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multicare.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on multicare.dk, including 10 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25