Website review, no card needed

multiva.com.mx logo

multiva.com.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202646 issues · 82 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on multiva.com.mx, 21 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
163 ms135 msMay 9Oct 24145 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026141 ms
May 16, 2026142 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026140 ms
Jun 6, 2026140 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026141 ms
Jul 18, 2026156 ms
Jul 25, 2026157 ms
Aug 1, 2026158 ms
Aug 8, 2026160 ms
Aug 15, 2026142 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026151 ms
Sep 26, 2026154 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026151 ms
Oct 17, 2026145 ms
Oct 24, 2026145 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of multiva.com.mx (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. multiva.com.mx at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. multiva.com.mx at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. multiva.com.mx at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. multiva.com.mx at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. multiva.com.mx at 6.1 s6.1 s
  6. multiva.com.mx at 7.4 s7.4 s
  7. multiva.com.mx at 8.6 s8.6 s
  8. multiva.com.mx at 9.8 s9.8 s

Speed

10 to fix36
  • Improve image delivery

    33.0 s · 23.9 MB

    22 images could be 23.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 33.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    30.6 s · 20.3 MB

    68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20.3 MB).

  • YouTube adds 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    YouTube costs a phone 3.8 s of main-thread work and 11.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 35). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 5.9 MB

    About 5.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 12.3 MB and 4.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 148 KiB

    About 148 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 416 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 207 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 57.8 s

    57.8 s

    Your largest element takes 57.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Descubre nuestro blog multiva”.

  • Speed Index: 55.0 s

    55.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 55.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 146.0 s

    146.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 146.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 139 ms

    139 ms

    Real visitors wait 139 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 38.2 MB in 290 requests

    38.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 38.2 MB in 290 requests on a phone: images 25.2 MB (51), scripts 10.7 MB (110) and HTML 877 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images over 500 KB

    11 images weigh 23.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    12.3 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 09c78b86-23ef-d6c4-c169-c3668e44a474 at 5,917 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 12.3 MB.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (24.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (7.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    7c236992-839f-102a-a70f-9381c23b140d is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 10.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.81 g of CO₂e: 1297.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8188
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9279
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (83 characters)

    Your title is 83 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Banco Multiva I Imagínate un banco que te conoce por tu nombre - www.multiva.com.mx”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 164 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 164 pages on multiva.com.mx and 27 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Un banco con soluciones financieras para gobiernos, empresas, personas, sectores de infraestructura, energía, inmobilia…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.multiva.com.mx/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://multivapublicportal.lxc.liferay.com/documents/d/guest/sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.multiva.com.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (968 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas and https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/cuentas all use the title “Cuentas Multiva: elige la mejor para ti. - www.multiva.com.mx”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas and https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/cuentas use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas, whose canonical is https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/cuentas. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas, https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/cuentas, https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/banca-patrimonial-y-privada, https://www.multiva.com.mx/personas/seguros, https://www.multiva.com.mx/empresas/soluciones-de-pago/tpv and https://www.multiva.com.mx/empresas/soluciones-de-pago/ligas-de-pago and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    92 of 93 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 750 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 750 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multiva.com.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Google Cloud

Company

Founded
2006

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on multiva.com.mx, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25