Website review, no card needed
myanimelist.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202649 issues · 92 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on myanimelist.net, 16 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 127 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
8.7 s · 961 KiBAbout 961 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
8.1 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.1 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.7 s · 1.4 MB39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 667 KiB10 images could be 667 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 48). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and InMobi and others), adding 1.5 MB and 694 ms of main-thread time.
Duplicated JavaScript
600 ms · 83 KiB83 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 178 KiBAbout 178 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
Google CDN adds 259 ms
259 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 281 ms
281 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,505 HTML elements
The page has 1,505 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
InMobi adds 97 ms
97 msInMobi costs a phone 97 ms of main-thread work and 330 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 190 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 15.4 s
15.4 sThe first text or image appears after 15.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.8 s
25.8 sYour largest element takes 25.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “If you wish to opt-out of the sale, sharing to third partie…”.
Time to Interactive: 26.2 s
26.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.4 s
15.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 124 ms to 127 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 157 ms
157 msReal visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 138 ms
138 msScripts block the page for only 138 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.019
0.019The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.019, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 89 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 89 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (14), fonts 915 KiB (4) and images 861 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
295 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20260129204834_2026-Free-Course-708x440.png at 708 px wide, shown at 70 px. Resized copies would save about 295 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (324 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
44 text elements with low contrast
44 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
42 tap targets too small
42 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
10 images without alt text
10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
25 links without text
25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (220 characters)
Your meta description is 220 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
12 links with vague text
12 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
338 internal links, 46 external
The homepage links to 338 pages on myanimelist.net and 46 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Welcome to MyAnimeList.net!”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “MyAnimeList.net - Anime and Manga Database and Community”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://myanimelist.net/sitemap/index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://myanimelist.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,061 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://myanimelist.net/recommendations.php, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a meta description
https://myanimelist.net/membership has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://myanimelist.net/ms/u/YU_20261009_PDA/https/the-vermilion-mask.com/en has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 134 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
174 small tap targets
174 of 274 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,145 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,145 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at myanimelist.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on myanimelist.net, including 24 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.