Website review, no card needed

nalearning.org logo

nalearning.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202632 issues · 79 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on nalearning.org, 8 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
533 ms501 msApr 18Oct 3522 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026516 ms
Apr 25, 2026516 ms
May 2, 2026515 ms
May 9, 2026512 ms
May 16, 2026508 ms
May 23, 2026505 ms
May 30, 2026506 ms
Jun 6, 2026510 ms
Jun 13, 2026518 ms
Jun 20, 2026521 ms
Jun 27, 2026521 ms
Jul 4, 2026522 ms
Jul 11, 2026509 ms
Jul 18, 2026512 ms
Jul 25, 2026511 ms
Aug 1, 2026509 ms
Aug 8, 2026518 ms
Aug 15, 2026520 ms
Aug 22, 2026528 ms
Aug 29, 2026529 ms
Sep 5, 2026524 ms
Sep 12, 2026519 ms
Sep 19, 2026519 ms
Sep 26, 2026514 ms
Oct 3, 2026522 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
63 ms61 msApr 18Oct 362 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202663 ms
Apr 25, 202662 ms
May 2, 202662 ms
May 9, 202662 ms
May 16, 202661 ms
May 23, 202661 ms
May 30, 202661 ms
Jun 6, 202661 ms
Jun 13, 202661 ms
Jun 20, 202662 ms
Jun 27, 202662 ms
Jul 4, 202663 ms
Jul 11, 202662 ms
Jul 18, 202662 ms
Jul 25, 202662 ms
Aug 1, 202662 ms
Aug 8, 202662 ms
Aug 15, 202662 ms
Aug 22, 202662 ms
Aug 29, 202662 ms
Sep 5, 202662 ms
Sep 12, 202662 ms
Sep 19, 202662 ms
Sep 26, 202662 ms
Oct 3, 202662 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of nalearning.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. nalearning.org at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. nalearning.org at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. nalearning.org at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. nalearning.org at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. nalearning.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. nalearning.org at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. nalearning.org at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. nalearning.org at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

11 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.7 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 3.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 96). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 1.8 MB

    9 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 1.7 MB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, avochato.com and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 558 KiB

    About 558 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • avochato.com adds 417 ms

    417 ms

    avochato.com costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 499 ms

    499 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 499 ms of main-thread work and 730 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 95 KiB

    About 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 261 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 96 but mobile only 49. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 20.4 s

    20.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “North American Learning Institute (NALI) is an eLearning or…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 484 ms

    484 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 484 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 63 ms to 62 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.5 s to 0.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 701 ms

    701 ms

    Real visitors wait 701 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.6 MB in 48 requests

    4.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 48 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (12), scripts 1.2 MB (20) and fonts 759 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (216 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.29 g of CO₂e: 154.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9899
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8573
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Affordable, easily accessible online education” and “Affordable, easily accessible online education”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://nalearning.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 36 internal links, 44 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on nalearning.org and 44 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “North American Learning Institute”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://nalearning.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://nalearning.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (740 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 11 pages share a title

    /, https://nalearning.org/es, https://nalearning.org/court-required-classes, https://nalearning.org/workplace-compliance-training, https://nalearning.org/secondary-school-and-higher-education-programs and https://nalearning.org/personal-growth-and-development-classes and 5 others all use the title “North American Learning Institute”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://nalearning.org/es, https://nalearning.org/about-us, https://nalearning.org/court-required-classes, https://nalearning.org/workplace-compliance-training, https://nalearning.org/secondary-school-and-higher-education-programs and https://nalearning.org/personal-growth-and-development-classes and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 639 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 639 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more about NALI” and “Start Now”.

  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Start Now”, “Contact Us” and “Learn more about NALI”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks, 5 customer or partner logos and 6 trust badges.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Mixpanel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nalearning.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on nalearning.org, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25