Website review, no card needed
nanografi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202645 issues · 106 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on nanografi.com, 14 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #59,672 of 81,485 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #32,878 of 40,337 online storesbeats 15%
- #480 of 716 BigCommerce storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among BigCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 205 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 191 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
16.0 s · 8.8 MB10 images could be 8.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 1.7 MB170 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
4.0 s38 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 429 KiBAbout 429 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
3,532 HTML elements
The page has 3,532 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 163 KiBAbout 163 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
700 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 700 ms).
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 129 ms
129 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 129 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 555 KiB and 218 ms of main-thread time.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 141 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 395 ms
395 msYour server sent the HTML in 395 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 52.4 s
52.4 sYour largest element takes 52.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Empowering Innovation Through Next-Generation Technologies”.
Time to Interactive: 54.6 s
54.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 54.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 301 ms
301 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 301 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.016
0.016The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.016, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.3 MB in 184 requests
17.3 MBYour homepage downloads 17.3 MB in 184 requests on a phone: images 15.8 MB (87), scripts 919 KiB (48) and fonts 326 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
35 images in older formats
35 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images far larger than shown
228 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example matterial.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 111 px. Resized copies would save about 228 KiB.
About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit
4.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.90 g of CO₂e: 588.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 186 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Nanografi | Materials, Technology & Engineering Solutions - Nanografi”.
Meta description is long (418 characters)
Your meta description is 418 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://nanografi.com/?sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
174 internal links, 40 external
The homepage links to 174 pages on nanografi.com and 40 external pages.
2 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://nanografi.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,613 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
/industries/healthcare, /industries/electronics, /industries/automotive, /industries/aerospace, /industries/energy and /industries/defense and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
/tr, /about-us, /testimonials-partners-1, /news-announcements, /career and /our-industries and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “grecaptcha is not defined”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 broken links to your own pages
2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://nanografi.com/industries/ (404).
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/in/nanografi-nanotechnology/ (999).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (nanografi.com).
Valid certificate (37 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for nanografi.com and is valid for another 37 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://nanografi.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
nanografi.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
nanografi.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearsnanografi.com was registered in Jun 2011 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2027
nanografi.com is registered until Jun 2027.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 462 words of copy
The homepage carries about 462 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact.”, “Get Started” and “Shop Now”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 6 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be nanografi.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 +a +mx include:_spf.bigcommerce.com include:_spf.google.com include:spfa.mailendo.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 3 plugins are behind their latest release.cf7-multi-step 2.9.0 → 2.9.1 · contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.2 · elementor 4.3.4 → 4.3.5
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- BigCommerce;BigCommerce Stencil
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Company
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- Ankara
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 45 issues on nanografi.com, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.