Website review, no card needed

neiu.edu logo

neiu.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202644 issues · 93 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on neiu.edu, 16 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
225 ms153 msMay 9Oct 24217 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026168 ms
May 16, 2026169 ms
May 23, 2026176 ms
May 30, 2026176 ms
Jun 6, 2026174 ms
Jun 13, 2026170 ms
Jun 20, 2026161 ms
Jun 27, 2026162 ms
Jul 4, 2026162 ms
Jul 11, 2026162 ms
Jul 18, 2026166 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026167 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026184 ms
Aug 22, 2026196 ms
Aug 29, 2026208 ms
Sep 5, 2026206 ms
Sep 12, 2026206 ms
Sep 19, 2026204 ms
Sep 26, 2026195 ms
Oct 3, 2026201 ms
Oct 10, 2026201 ms
Oct 17, 2026213 ms
Oct 24, 2026217 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of neiu.edu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. neiu.edu at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. neiu.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  3. neiu.edu at 4.0 s4.0 s
  4. neiu.edu at 5.3 s5.3 s
  5. neiu.edu at 6.6 s6.6 s
  6. neiu.edu at 7.9 s7.9 s
  7. neiu.edu at 9.2 s9.2 s
  8. neiu.edu at 10.5 s10.5 s

Speed

14 to fix29
  • Improve image delivery

    7.7 s · 2.0 MB

    12 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 559 KiB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (559 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 839 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 69). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, botpress.cloud and TikTok and others), adding 2.6 MB and 4.1 s of main-thread time.

  • botpress.cloud adds 566 ms

    566 ms

    botpress.cloud costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 708 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • TikTok adds 521 ms

    521 ms

    TikTok costs a phone 521 ms of main-thread work and 280 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 489 ms

    489 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 489 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 469 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 123 KiB

    About 123 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • weglot.com adds 281 ms

    281 ms

    weglot.com costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 155 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    35 KiB

    35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 69 but mobile only 29. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.4 s

    18.4 s

    Your largest element takes 18.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Continue Your Education banner with 3 students smiling”.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.0 s

    32.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 217 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 178 ms

    178 ms

    Real visitors wait 178 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 519 ms

    519 ms

    Real visitors wait 519 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix43
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 212 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 212 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (59), images 2.4 MB (46) and stylesheets 132 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (1.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    26_Website3.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    36 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example northeastern-illinois-university-147776-icon at 325 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 36 KiB.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.52 g of CO₂e: 182.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9194
  • Hidden but focusable

    6 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9277
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (165 characters)

    Your meta description is 165 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 11 links with vague text

    11 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 179 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 179 pages on neiu.edu and 16 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Northeastern Illinois University | Chicago, IL”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.neiu.edu/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.neiu.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.neiu.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,678 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.neiu.edu/academics/programs, https://www.neiu.edu/mosaic, https://www.neiu.edu/continue and https://www.neiu.edu/one-stop-center have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.neiu.edu/admissions/your-success, whose canonical is https://www.neiu.edu/admissions/student-services-and-support. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.neiu.edu/admissions/visit and https://www.neiu.edu/one-stop-center have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 147 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 135 small tap targets

    135 of 150 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,648 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,648 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Learn More”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Request Info” and “Apply”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 33 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 43 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at neiu.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on neiu.edu, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25