Website review, no card needed
nerdaocubo.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202647 issues · 84 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on nerdaocubo.com.br, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 10.3 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #96,160 of 109,151 reviewed websitesbeats 10%
- #57,638 of 61,807 online storesbeats 5%
- #53,187 of 56,383 Shopify storesbeats 5%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 235 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.3 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.3 s
4.0 s
4.6 s
5.3 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 10.3 s
A phone's processor spends 10.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and ZenDesk and others), adding 3.7 MB and 2.4 s of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 997 ms
997 msYouTube costs a phone 997 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 877 KiBAbout 877 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 832 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 674 ms
674 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 674 ms of main-thread work and 200 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
500 ms · 147 KiB6 images could be 147 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 99 KiBAbout 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
ZenDesk adds 339 ms
339 msZenDesk costs a phone 339 ms of main-thread work and 431 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 37 KiB37 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 125 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (125 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
6 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 29.4 s
29.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.0 s
2.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sYour largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 177 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 167 ms
167 msReal visitors wait 167 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.4 MB in 316 requests
5.4 MBYour homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 316 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (73), other files 1.1 MB (207) and images 566 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (38 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.52 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.52 g of CO₂e: 182.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (4 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “Nerd ao Cubo”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
51 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on nerdaocubo.com.br and 12 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://nerdaocubo.com.br/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://nerdaocubo.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (376 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://nerdaocubo.com.br/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://nerdaocubo.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://nerdaocubo.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without a meta description
https://nerdaocubo.com.br/collections/frontpage and https://nerdaocubo.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://nerdaocubo.com.br/collections/frontpage and https://nerdaocubo.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://nerdaocubo.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
3 pages of 14 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26082058&Ver=2&mid=149e51ab-336c-4e0a-a345-971709891491&bo=1&sid=dd90a290dd9411f1ba606f85535b10e3&vid=dd90f0e0dd9411f1b557999024254084&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
14 small tap targets
14 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://assets.smartwishlist.webmarked.net/static/v6/css/smartwishlist.min.css?20200409' f…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 13-field form
Your longest form asks for 13 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 170 words
The homepage has only about 170 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nerdaocubo.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Analyzify Ga4 Ads Tracking · webmarked.net · backinstock.org · cloudfront.net
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on nerdaocubo.com.br, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.