Website review, no card needed
netzoom.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202643 issues · 91 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on netzoom.net, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 93 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 1.8 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 727 KiBAbout 727 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.6 s · 340 KiBAbout 340 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
820 KiB13 images could be 820 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.6 MB and 514 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 363 ms
363 msYouTube costs a phone 363 ms of main-thread work and 979 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 143 ms
143 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 143 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 8 ms
8 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 8 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 79 KiB79 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 786 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.2 s
16.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Data Center professionals use NetZoom® Enterprise data cent…”.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 53% slower for real visitors
+53%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 74% slower for real visitors
+74%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 184 ms
184 msReal visitors wait 184 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 91 ms
91 msScripts block the page for only 91 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.4 MB in 70 requests
3.4 MBYour homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 70 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (16), images 1.3 MB (30) and fonts 318 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (147 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (147 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.96 g of CO₂e: 115.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Active <area> elements must have alternative text (1 element)
Active <area> elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
18 text elements with low contrast
18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
7 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
25 images without alt text
25 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (4 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (121 characters)
Your title is 121 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “DCIM Software| Data Center Infrastructure Management Software, Data Center Asset Manageme…”.
Meta description is long (690 characters)
Your meta description is 690 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
69 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 69 pages on netzoom.net and 4 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “NetZoom: Next Generation DCIM Software for Hybrid Data Centers”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.netzoom.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Corporation.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.netzoom.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.netzoom.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (580 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.netzoom.com/products/inventory-asset-management.html and https://www.netzoom.com/products/dcim-for-higher-education.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.netzoom.com/products/dcim-for-higher-education.html, whose canonical is https://www.netzoom.com/products/inventory-asset-management.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not defined”.
24 distorted images
24 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 504 words of copy
The homepage carries about 504 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “demo” and “schedule a demo”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at netzoom.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Network Solutions, LLC
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on netzoom.net, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.