Website review, no card needed
newsweek.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202636 issues · 87 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on newsweek.com, 12 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 46. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.5 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.0 s
A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,156 HTML elements
The page has 4,156 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (confiant-integrations.net, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 812 KiB68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (812 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
949 KiBAbout 949 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
confiant-integrations.net adds 497 ms
497 msconfiant-integrations.net costs a phone 497 ms of main-thread work and 341 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 295 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 260 ms
260 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 335 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 167 ms
167 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 167 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
148 KiB7 images could be 148 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
136 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 136 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 26.7 s
26.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sYour largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Image for article: Democrats Fear Their ‘Blue Wave’ May Hav…”.
Speed Index: 5.6 s
5.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 92 ms
92 msReal visitors wait 92 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 365 ms
365 msReal visitors wait 365 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 40% faster for real visitors
-40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006
0.006The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 247 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 247 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (88), images 642 KiB (37) and stylesheets 137 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.05 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 125.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
20 text elements with low contrast
20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (91 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 91 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
33 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (80 characters)
Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Newsweek - Latest Breaking News, US, World, Politics, Business, Tech and Videos.”.
Meta description is long (166 characters)
Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.newsweek.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
594 internal links, 105 external
The homepage links to 594 pages on newsweek.com and 105 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.newsweek.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers
2 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.newsweek.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,620 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 143 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://di.rlcdn.com/api/segment?pid=468096&pdata=prop%3Dnw_site.
26 small tap targets
26 of 62 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,905 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,905 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Register Now” and “Sign up”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Ketch) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
34 cookies set on arrival
34Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
65 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 65 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Ketch
A consent management tool (Ketch) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at newsweek.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Hiring
- Hiring
- 21 open roles
- Teams
- Editorial: Digital Content UK (6), Editorial : Digital Content US (2), Editorial: Digital Publishing (2), AdPrime (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on newsweek.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.