Website review, no card needed

newsweek.com logo

newsweek.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202636 issues · 87 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on newsweek.com, 12 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 46. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.0 sApr 18Oct 31.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.0 s
Apr 25, 20262.0 s
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
203 ms127 msApr 18Oct 3136 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026162 ms
Apr 25, 2026166 ms
May 2, 2026169 ms
May 9, 2026187 ms
May 16, 2026194 ms
May 23, 2026194 ms
May 30, 2026179 ms
Jun 6, 2026161 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026152 ms
Jun 27, 2026149 ms
Jul 4, 2026150 ms
Jul 11, 2026153 ms
Jul 18, 2026151 ms
Jul 25, 2026153 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026150 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026145 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026140 ms
Oct 3, 2026136 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of newsweek.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. newsweek.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. newsweek.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. newsweek.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. newsweek.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. newsweek.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. newsweek.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. newsweek.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. newsweek.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

11 to fix46
  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,156 HTML elements

    The page has 4,156 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (confiant-integrations.net, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 812 KiB

    68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (812 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    949 KiB

    About 949 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • confiant-integrations.net adds 497 ms

    497 ms

    confiant-integrations.net costs a phone 497 ms of main-thread work and 341 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 295 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 260 ms

    260 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 335 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 167 ms

    167 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 167 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    148 KiB

    7 images could be 148 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    136 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 136 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 26.7 s

    26.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Your largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Image for article: Democrats Fear Their ‘Blue Wave’ May Hav…”.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 92 ms

    92 ms

    Real visitors wait 92 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 365 ms

    365 ms

    Real visitors wait 365 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% faster for real visitors

    -40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 247 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 247 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (88), images 642 KiB (37) and stylesheets 137 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 125.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7891
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (91 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 91 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    33 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9274
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (80 characters)

    Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Newsweek - Latest Breaking News, US, World, Politics, Business, Tech and Videos.”.

  • Meta description is long (166 characters)

    Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.newsweek.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 594 internal links, 105 external

    The homepage links to 594 pages on newsweek.com and 105 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.newsweek.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers

    2 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.newsweek.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,620 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 143 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 5469
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://di.rlcdn.com/api/segment?pid=468096&pdata=prop%3Dnw_site.

  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 62 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,905 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,905 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Register Now” and “Sign up”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Ketch) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 34 cookies set on arrival

    34

    Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 65 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 65 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Ketch

    A consent management tool (Ketch) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at newsweek.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Hiring

Hiring
21 open roles
Teams
Editorial: Digital Content UK (6), Editorial : Digital Content US (2), Editorial: Digital Publishing (2), AdPrime (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on newsweek.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25