Website review, no card needed
nextdoor.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202643 issues · 71 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on nextdoor.com, 20 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Nextdoor
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 335 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 332 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 329 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 326 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 322 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 371 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 379 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 381 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 384 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 372 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 362 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.8 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.4 s · 995 KiBAbout 995 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.0 s · 673 KiB41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (673 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.5 s · 509 KiB7 images could be 509 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudfront.net, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 3.6 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
cloudfront.net adds 871 ms
871 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 871 ms of main-thread work and 2.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 728 ms
728 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 728 ms of main-thread work and 692 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 463 ms
463 msFacebook costs a phone 463 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 52 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 52 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 295 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify CSS
26 KiB26 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 9.7 s
9.7 sThe first text or image appears after 9.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.1 s
23.1 sYour largest element takes 23.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 23.9 s
23.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.7 s
11.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 228 ms
228 msReal visitors wait 228 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 332 ms to 362 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.6 s to 5.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 790 ms
790 msReal visitors wait 790 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.046
0.046The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.046, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 115 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 115 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (37), images 1.1 MB (15) and fonts 57 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
6 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 31871d3c4c1f209e.jpg at 884 px wide, shown at 280 px. Resized copies would save about 6 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (189 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (112 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.06 g of CO₂e: 127.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
autocomplete attribute must be used correctly (1 element)
autocomplete attribute must be used correctly: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “Nextdoor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://nextdoor.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 98 characters
Your meta description is 98 characters: “Join Nextdoor, an app for neighborhoods where you can get local tips, buy and sell items, and more”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no https://nextdoor.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26069765&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=a4d9070d-b0fa-4b9d-842d-def5a9049e7d&bo=1&sid=232717d0c5c811f1a82cd3f0d8361a0d&vid=23274500c5c811f19957675f8f4515b6&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
4 small tap targets
4 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Didomi - Authorization Parameters configuration: Invalid Organization User Id "undefined". The value will be ignored”.
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 101 words
The homepage has only about 101 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up” and “Get started”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Didomi
A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nextdoor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on nextdoor.com, including 21 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.