Website review, no card needed
ngkbusi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202652 issues · 87 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on ngkbusi.com, 22 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 403 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.8 s · 5.7 MB55 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 2.3 MB20 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 478 KiBAbout 478 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 270 KiBAbout 270 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.5 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.5 s).
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Google Analytics and others), adding 866 KiB and 542 ms of main-thread time.
Document request latency
550 ms · 74 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
565 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 565 ms on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 433 ms
433 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 433 ms of main-thread work and 809 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 665 ms
665 msYour server takes 665 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 720 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.0 s
18.0 sYour largest element takes 18.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PRODUK UNGGULAN BUSI HARIAN-MU UPGRADE EKONOMIS UPGRADE PER…”.
Time to Interactive: 23.9 s
23.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.332
0.332The layout shifts by 0.332 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 105% slower for real visitors
+105%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 403 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 44% slower for real visitors
+44%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 930 ms
930 msReal visitors wait 930 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
33 images without width and height
33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 152 ms
152 msReal visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 108 ms
108 msScripts block the page for only 108 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 79 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 79 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (33), media 1.9 MB (3) and scripts 1.0 MB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
1.7 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example button-lazada.png at 3,840 px wide, shown at 75 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.
1 image over 500 KB
button-lazada.png weighs 806 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images in older formats
8 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
FA_FakeSP_Legal-Action_Web-Banner.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.87 g of CO₂e: 224.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 tap targets too small
9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “NGK Busi Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (188 characters)
Your meta description is 188 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://ngkbusi.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
74 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 74 pages on ngkbusi.com and 23 external pages.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,382 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://ngkbusi.com/did all use the title “NGK Busi Indonesia”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
12 pages share a meta description
https://ngkbusi.com/products, https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/updates, https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Editorial, https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Tips and https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Activity and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://ngkbusi.com/products, https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/motorsports/domestic and https://ngkbusi.com/about have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://ngkbusi.com/about and https://ngkbusi.com/about/worldwide have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/updates and https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Editorial took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
38 small tap targets
38 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,313 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,313 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “DOWNLOAD BULLETIN TERBARU!”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ngkbusi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on ngkbusi.com, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.