Website review, no card needed

ngkbusi.com logo

ngkbusi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202652 issues · 87 checks

This review found 52 issues worth fixing on ngkbusi.com, 22 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 173.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
444 ms105 msMay 2Oct 17403 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026199 ms
May 9, 2026194 ms
May 16, 2026199 ms
May 23, 2026199 ms
May 30, 2026197 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026192 ms
Jun 20, 2026178 ms
Jun 27, 2026178 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Aug 8, 2026157 ms
Aug 15, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026405 ms
Oct 10, 2026404 ms
Oct 17, 2026403 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ngkbusi.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ngkbusi.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. ngkbusi.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  3. ngkbusi.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  4. ngkbusi.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  5. ngkbusi.com at 7.9 s7.9 s
  6. ngkbusi.com at 9.4 s9.4 s
  7. ngkbusi.com at 11.0 s11.0 s
  8. ngkbusi.com at 12.6 s12.6 s

Speed

12 to fix40
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.8 s · 5.7 MB

    55 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 s · 2.3 MB

    20 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 478 KiB

    About 478 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.6 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 270 KiB

    About 270 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.5 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.5 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Google Analytics and others), adding 866 KiB and 542 ms of main-thread time.

  • Document request latency

    550 ms · 74 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    565 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 565 ms on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 433 ms

    433 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 433 ms of main-thread work and 809 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 665 ms

    665 ms

    Your server takes 665 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 720 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    Your largest element takes 18.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PRODUK UNGGULAN BUSI HARIAN-MU UPGRADE EKONOMIS UPGRADE PER…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.9 s

    23.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.332

    0.332

    The layout shifts by 0.332 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 105% slower for real visitors

    +105%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 403 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% slower for real visitors

    +44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 930 ms

    930 ms

    Real visitors wait 930 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 33 images without width and height

    33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Real visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 108 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 6.6 MB in 79 requests

    6.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 79 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (33), media 1.9 MB (3) and scripts 1.0 MB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example button-lazada.png at 3,840 px wide, shown at 75 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    button-lazada.png weighs 806 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    FA_FakeSP_Legal-Action_Web-Banner.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.87 g of CO₂e: 224.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8988
  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 10063
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “NGK Busi Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (188 characters)

    Your meta description is 188 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ngkbusi.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 74 internal links, 23 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on ngkbusi.com and 23 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,382 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 6 pages share 2 titles

    / and https://ngkbusi.com/did all use the title “NGK Busi Indonesia”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 12 pages share a meta description

    https://ngkbusi.com/products, https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/updates, https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Editorial, https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Tips and https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Activity and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://ngkbusi.com/products, https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/motorsports/domestic and https://ngkbusi.com/about have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://ngkbusi.com/about and https://ngkbusi.com/about/worldwide have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://ngkbusi.com/did, https://ngkbusi.com/updates and https://ngkbusi.com/updates/view/Editorial took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 38 small tap targets

    38 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,313 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,313 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “DOWNLOAD BULLETIN TERBARU!”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ngkbusi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 52 issues on ngkbusi.com, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25